Title
A Study to Evaluate Immunogenicity of Various Schedules of Inactivated Polio Vaccine
A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Humoral Immunogenicity of Various Schedules of Intramuscular Full Dose and Intradermal Fractional Dose of Inactivated Polio Vaccine in Infants
Phase
Phase 3Lead Sponsor
Fidec CorporationStudy Type
InterventionalStatus
WithdrawnIndication/Condition
PoliomyelitisIntervention/Treatment
inactivated poliovirus type 2 vaccine Inactivated polio virus - Enhanced ...Study Participants
0The study will evaluate the humoral immunogenicity in various schedule combinations of full dose inactivated polio vaccines (IPV) via intramuscular administration (IM) and of the fractional dose of inactivated poliovaccine (f-IPV) via intradermal administration (ID).
The study will be conducted in a setting where only IPV is being used for polio prevention in infant immunization schedules.
The study population will include infants from Uruguay, a pioneer country in immunization programs in Latin America, where tOPV(trivalent oral polio vaccine) was used until 2012, after which the program changed to an all-IPV schedule without transition.
The primary IPV immunization schedule in the country is as stand-alone vaccine at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, with a booster dose at 15 months. This setting allows the evaluation of IPV immunogenicity in a scenario where the circulation of any poliovirus is highly unlikely.
Infants will receive two or three doses of full dose IPV IM or fractional dose f-IPV ID, in various schedule combinations (6 and 14 weeks; 10 and 14 weeks; 14 and 36 weeks; 6, 14 and 36 weeks; 10, 14 and 36 weeks). Immunological and safety assessments will be made after one dose, two doses and three doses.
The study will be conducted in Montevideo, Uruguay and a total of 1493 infants will be randomized into 6 groups. Other vaccines comprise DTPw-HB-Hib (pentavalent combined diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-hepatitis B-Hib vaccine), Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, Rotavirus and will be administered concomitantly.
Optimum immunogenicity expected from the dose/s of IPV in the post-eradication era will have to be balanced with the cost and supply constraints of IPV. This study will be critical to determine how many doses of IPV and which schedule will be recommended for the post-eradication era after the cessation of OPV (oral polio vaccine) usage globally.
Comparison of different vaccination schedules with 2 different vaccines (IPV and f-IPV) and 2 different types of administration (IM and ID)
Comparison of different vaccination schedules with 2 different vaccines (IPV and f-IPV) and 2 different types of administration (IM and ID)
3 doses IPV IM at 10, 14 & 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 10, 18, 36 & 40 weeks.
3 doses f-IPV ID at 10, 14 & 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 10, 18, 36 & 40 weeks.
2 doses IPV IM at 14 & 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 14, 18, 36 & 40 weeks.
2 doses f-IPV ID at 14 & 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 14, 18, 36 & 40 weeks.
3 doses IPV IM at 6, 14 & 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 6, 18, 36 & 40 weeks.
3 doses f-IPV ID at 6, 14 & 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 6, 18, 36 & 40 weeks.
Inclusion Criteria: Infants of 6 weeks of age (-7 to + 7 days) on date of first vaccination Healthy, as assessed from medical history and physical examination by a study physician Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal representatives that they have been properly informed about the study and are able to comply with planned study procedures Exclusion Criteria: Vaccinated with any poliovirus vaccine prior to inclusion A household contact with OPV vaccination history in the past 4 weeks HIV infection or pharmacologic immunosuppression. Known allergy to any component of the study vaccines (phenoxyethanol, formaldehyde) Uncontrolled coagulopathy or blood disorder contraindicating intramuscular and intradermal injections. Acute severe febrile illness on day of vaccination deemed by the Investigator to be a contraindication for vaccination. Not suitable for inclusion or is unlikely to comply with the protocol in the opinion of the investigator.
