Title
Immunogenicity of H5N1 Vaccine Following H5N2
Immunogenicity of OrniFlu® Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Subjects Previously Immunized With Live Attenuated H5N2 Influenza Vaccine and in Non-vaccinated Subjects
Phase
Phase 2Lead Sponsor
PATHStudy Type
InterventionalStatus
Completed Results PostedIndication/Condition
Influenza VaccineIntervention/Treatment
tivantinib ...Study Participants
43This study is designed to assess whether a live attenuated Influenza vaccine (LAIV) can induce a long-lasting immune memory by comparing the immunologic response to two doses of the OrniFlu® inactivated vaccine given to subjects previously primed with LAIV and subjects who did not received LAIV.
This study evaluated immunogenicity of an adjuvanted A(H5N1) inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in healthy adult subjects who received A(H5N2) live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) 1.5 years earlier (September/October 2012) and compared this with a group of naive subjects that did not participate in the previous study. Inclusion/exclusion criteria for the additional group of naive volunteers mirrored those utilized in the initial study.
Prepared from the NIBRG-23 vaccine virus strain. One vaccine dose (0.5 ml) contained 15 mg of influenza A(H5N1) virus hemagglutinin (HA), adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide. Two doses were administered intramuscularly 28 days apart.
Two doses of A(H5N2) live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) administered 28 days apart, approximately 1.5 years prior to receiving A(H5N1) IIV
Subjects who received A(H5N1) inactivated influenza vaccine as well as primed with H5N2 live attenuated influenza vaccine approximately 1.5 years before
Subjects who received A(H5N1) inactivated influenza vaccine and did not receive A(H5N2) live attenuated influenza vaccine in a previous study.
Inclusion Criteria: Legal male or female adult 18 through 51 years of age at the enrollment visit Literate and willing to provide written informed consent A signed informed consent Free of obvious health problems, as established by the medical history and screening evaluations, including physical examination Capable and willing to complete a memory aid and willing to return for all follow-up visits For females, willing to take reliable birth control measures through Day 56 Exclusion Criteria: Participation in another clinical trial involving any investigational agent within the previous three months or planned enrollment in such a trial during the period of this study Receipt of any non-study vaccine within four weeks prior to enrollment or refusal to postpone receipt Participation in any other clinical trials involving any H5-matched influenza vaccines except that in Protocol LAIV-H5N2-01 Current or recent (within two weeks of enrollment) acute respiratory illness with or without fever Other acute illness at the time of study enrollment Receipt of immunoglobulin or other blood products within three months prior to study enrollment or planned receipt during study period Chronic administration (defined as more than 14 consecutively-prescribed days) of immunosuppressants and/or immune-modulating therapy within six months prior to study enrollment History of bronchial asthma Hypersensitivity after previous administration of any (not only influenza) vaccines. Other adverse event (AE) following immunization at least possibly related to previous receipt of any (not only influenza) vaccine Suspected or known hypersensitivity to any of the study vaccine components, including protein of chicken eggs Seasonal (autumnal) hypersensitivity to the natural environment Acute or chronic clinically significant abnormality, as determined by medical history, physical examination or clinical laboratory screening tests, which in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the study objectives. Subjects with physical examination findings or clinical laboratory screening results which would be graded 2 or higher on the AE severity grading scale will be excluded from entry into the study History of leukemia or any other blood diseases or solid organ cancer History of thrombocytopenic purpura or known bleeding disorder History of seizures Known or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition of any kind, including HIV infection Known chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C (HCV) infection Known tuberculosis infection or evidence of previous tuberculosis exposure History of chronic alcohol abuse and/or illegal drug use Pregnancy or lactation. Systemic connective tissue disorders Adrenal gland diseases Hereditary, degenerative and progredient diseases of the nervous system Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would increase the health risk to the subject if he/she participates in the study or would interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives Allergic, including anaphylactic, reactions to any (not only influenza) vaccines
Event Type | Organ System | Event Term | H5N2 Primed | Control |
---|
The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells. A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion.
The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells. A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion.
The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells. A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion.
The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells. A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion.
Serum specimens were tested for neutralizing antibodies against A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)) LAIV strain and A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1) by MN using Madin-Darby Canine Kidney cells. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as reciprocal of the greatest dilution giving a neutralization of 50% on the cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture (TCID50).
Serum specimens were tested for neutralizing antibodies against A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)) LAIV strain and A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1) by MN using Madin-Darby Canine Kidney cells. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as reciprocal of the greatest dilution giving a neutralization of 50% on the cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture (TCID50).
A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion. The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells.
A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion. The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells.
A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion. The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells.
A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion. The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells.
Serum specimens were tested for neutralizing antibodies against A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)) LAIV strain and A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1) by MN using Madin-Darby Canine Kidney cells. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as reciprocal of the greatest dilution giving a neutralization of 50% on the cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture (TCID50). A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion.
Serum specimens were tested for neutralizing antibodies against A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)) LAIV strain and A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1) by MN using Madin-Darby Canine Kidney cells. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as reciprocal of the greatest dilution giving a neutralization of 50% on the cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture (TCID50). A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion.
Seroprotection was defined as ≥1:40 antibody titer. The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells.
Seroprotection was defined as ≥1:40 antibody titer. The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells.
Seroprotection was defined as ≥1:40 antibody titer. The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells.
Seroprotection was defined as ≥1:40 antibody titer. The following H5 antigens were tested to evaluate the breadth of the response: i) A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)); ii) A/turkey/Turkey/5/05(H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (NIBRG-23 (H5N1)); iii) A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1)); and iv) A/17/duck/Potsdam/86/92 (H5N2) (d/Pot (H5N2)). HAI tests were performed on serum samples with the conventional WHO-recommended assays. Sera were pretreated with receptor destroying enzyme (RDE, Denka Seiken, Japan) and tested against 4 HA units of several H5 antigens using horse red blood cells.
Serum specimens were tested for neutralizing antibodies against A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)) LAIV strain and A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1) by MN using Madin-Darby Canine Kidney cells. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as reciprocal of the greatest dilution giving a neutralization of 50% on the cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture (TCID50). Seroprotection was defined as ≥1:40 antibody titer.
Serum specimens were tested for neutralizing antibodies against A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 (H5N2) (17/t/Tur (H5N2)) LAIV strain and A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) PR8-based candidate vaccine virus (Indo (H5N1) by MN using Madin-Darby Canine Kidney cells. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as reciprocal of the greatest dilution giving a neutralization of 50% on the cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture (TCID50). Seroprotection was defined as ≥1:40 antibody titer.
Detection of anti-hemagglutinin (HA) immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was carried out by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 16 HA units of sucrose-purified virus antigen was used to coat ELISA plates in a volume of 100 ml. Two-fold dilutions of sera were prepared starting from 1:10 (for IgA antibody) and 1:100 (for IgG antibody) and added to the coated wells, followed by incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgA or IgG.
Detection of anti-hemagglutinin (HA) immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was carried out by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 16 HA units of sucrose-purified virus antigen was used to coat ELISA plates in a volume of 100 ml. Two-fold dilutions of sera were prepared starting from 1:10 (for IgA antibody) and 1:100 (for IgG antibody) and added to the coated wells, followed by incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgA or IgG.
Detection of anti-hemagglutinin (HA) immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was carried out by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 16 HA units of sucrose-purified virus antigen was used to coat ELISA plates in a volume of 100 ml. Two-fold dilutions of sera were prepared starting from 1:10 (for IgA antibody) and 1:100 (for IgG antibody) and added to the coated wells, followed by incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgA or IgG.
Detection of anti-hemagglutinin (HA) immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was carried out by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 16 HA units of sucrose-purified virus antigen was used to coat ELISA plates in a volume of 100 ml. Two-fold dilutions of sera were prepared starting from 1:10 (for IgA antibody) and 1:100 (for IgG antibody) and added to the coated wells, followed by incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgA or IgG.
A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion. Detection of anti-hemagglutinin (HA) immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was carried out by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 16 HA units of sucrose-purified virus antigen was used to coat ELISA plates in a volume of 100 ml. Two-fold dilutions of sera were prepared starting from 1:10 (for IgA antibody) and 1:100 (for IgG antibody) and added to the coated wells, followed by incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgA or IgG.
A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion. Detection of anti-hemagglutinin (HA) immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was carried out by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 16 HA units of sucrose-purified virus antigen was used to coat ELISA plates in a volume of 100 ml. Two-fold dilutions of sera were prepared starting from 1:10 (for IgA antibody) and 1:100 (for IgG antibody) and added to the coated wells, followed by incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgA or IgG.
A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion. Detection of anti-hemagglutinin (HA) immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was carried out by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 16 HA units of sucrose-purified virus antigen was used to coat ELISA plates in a volume of 100 ml. Two-fold dilutions of sera were prepared starting from 1:10 (for IgA antibody) and 1:100 (for IgG antibody) and added to the coated wells, followed by incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgA or IgG.
A four-fold or greater antibody rise in titer was considered to be a seroconversion. Detection of anti-hemagglutinin (HA) immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was carried out by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 16 HA units of sucrose-purified virus antigen was used to coat ELISA plates in a volume of 100 ml. Two-fold dilutions of sera were prepared starting from 1:10 (for IgA antibody) and 1:100 (for IgG antibody) and added to the coated wells, followed by incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgA or IgG.
The avidity index (AI) was defined as the ratio of the mean optical density at 450 nm (OD450) with urea to that without urea, multiplied by 100. A 15% increase in the AI value was considered significant.
The avidity index (AI) was defined as the ratio of the mean optical density at 450 nm (OD450) with urea to that without urea, multiplied by 100. A 15% increase in the AI value was considered significant.
The avidity index (AI) was defined as the ratio of the mean optical density at 450 nm (OD450) with urea to that without urea, multiplied by 100. A 15% increase in the AI value was considered significant.
The avidity index (AI) was defined as the ratio of the mean optical density at 450 nm (OD450) with urea to that without urea, multiplied by 100. A 15% increase in the AI value was considered significant.
The avidity index (AI) was defined as the ratio of the mean optical density at 450 nm (OD450) with urea to that without urea, multiplied by 100. A 15% increase in the AI value was considered significant.
The avidity index (AI) was defined as the ratio of the mean optical density at 450 nm (OD450) with urea to that without urea, multiplied by 100. A 15% increase in the AI value was considered significant.
The avidity index (AI) was defined as the ratio of the mean optical density at 450 nm (OD450) with urea to that without urea, multiplied by 100. A 15% increase in the AI value was considered significant.
The avidity index (AI) was defined as the ratio of the mean optical density at 450 nm (OD450) with urea to that without urea, multiplied by 100. A 15% increase in the AI value was considered significant.
Subjects were asked to closely watch for and report any adverse events occurring the first 6 days after immunization, and followed for any reactions and adverse events occurring within 7 and 28 days after each vaccination.
Subjects were asked to closely watch for and report any adverse events occurring the first 6 days after immunization, and followed for any reactions and adverse events occurring within 7 and 28 days after each vaccination