Title

Cluster Randomized Trial of Hospitals to Assess Impact of Targeted Versus Universal Strategies to Reduce Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in Intensive Care Units (ICUs)
Cluster Randomized Trial of Hospitals to Assess Impact of Targeted Versus Universal
  • Phase

    N/A
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Study Participants

    74256
The Randomized Evaluation of Decolonization versus Universal Clearance to Eliminate MRSA (REDUCE MRSA) Trial is a cluster randomized trial of the comparative effectiveness of three strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in intensive care units. The three strategies to be evaluated are:

screening on admission followed by isolation of MRSA+ patients
screening on admission followed by isolation and decolonization of MRSA+ patients
universal decolonization on admission with no screening. The decolonization regimen involves bathing with chlorhexidine plus intra-nasal application of mupirocin. The main outcome will be MRSA+ clinical cultures.

The study is a partnership between the CDC, the CDC Prevention Epicenters, and the Hospital Corporation of America.
Baseline data involving 12 months of data for participating hospitals (July 2008 - June 2009) was collected prior to randomization to account for size and ICU baseline prevalence of MRSA in randomization scheme. Randomization occurred at the hospital level.

Eligibility survey was conducted to determine exclusion criteria.

As of May 2010, enrollment has been closed. 45 hospitals were randomized, but two were found to meet exclusion criteria and were excluded. As-randomized (or as-assigned) analysis included 43 hospitals, representing 74 ICUs. Individual (patient-level) subject enrollment during intervention is 74,256.
Study Started
Sep 30
2009
Primary Completion
Sep 30
2011
Study Completion
Sep 30
2011
Results Posted
Jul 30
2014
Estimate
Last Update
May 02
2017

Drug Chlorhexidine bath and nasal mupirocin

The intervention / decolonization regimen will consist of the most commonly used topical regimen in the US - a combination of daily baths with 2% chlorhexidine cloths , plus 5 days of topical intranasal mupirocin ointment (bilateral nares, twice daily)

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance No Intervention

Active Surveillance in All Adult ICUs, Contact Precautions for MRSA+

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization Active Comparator

Continue Active Surveillance (AS), MRSA decolonization based on AS, Continue Contact Precautions for MRSA+

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization Active Comparator

Chlorhexidine bath and nasal mupirocin for all, Discontinuation of Active Surveillance, Continuation of Contact Precautions for MRSA+

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria will include all HCA hospitals that reside in US states where physicians do NOT routinely prescribe decolonization for MRSA + ICU patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria will include hospitals where ICU physicians often prescribe decolonization for MRSA+ ICU patients.
Dedicated burn ICUs will also be excluded due to the inability to perform routine bathing.
Finally, since the intent is to assess the intervention in adult ICUs, pediatric hospitals will be excluded although patients <13 years old that are admitted to participating adult ICUs will be included in the unit-based intervention.

Summary

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

All Events

Event Type Organ System Event Term Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Main Outcome: Patients With Nosocomial MRSA Clinical Cultures

Hazard ratio for ICU-attributable MRSA+ clinical cultures comparing Baseline to Intervention period, by Arm, accounting for clustering by hospital.

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

0.92
hazard ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.77 to 1.1

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

0.75
hazard ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.63 to 0.89

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

0.63
hazard ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.52 to 0.75

ICU-attributable All-pathogen Bloodstream Infection

Hazard ratio for ICU-attributable positive blood culture from any pathogen, comparing Baseline to Intervention period, by Arm, accounting for clustering by hospital.

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

0.99
Hazard ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.84 to 1.16

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

0.78
Hazard ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.66 to 0.91

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

0.56
Hazard ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.49 to 0.65

Intervention Impact on Healthcare Costs

Costs (in dollars) per 1000 ICU-admissions associated with 3 ICU strategies to reduce ICU Bloodstream infection (BSI), (Arms 1-3).

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

Cost of contact precautions

Cost of decolonization

Cost of MRSA screening tests

ICU costs (not including intervention costs)

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Cost of contact precautions

Cost of decolonization

Cost of MRSA screening tests

ICU costs (not including intervention costs)

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Cost of contact precautions

Cost of decolonization

Cost of MRSA screening tests

ICU costs (not including intervention costs)

Blood Culture Contamination Rates

Odds ratio for ICU-attributable blood culture contamination rates, comparing Baseline to Intervention period across Arms, accounting for clustering by hospital.

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

As randomized, adjusted

0.73
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.57 to 0.94

As randomized, unadjusted

0.74
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.58 to 0.94

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

As randomized, adjusted

0.93
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.7 to 1.22

As randomized, unadjusted

0.94
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.72 to 1.23

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

As randomized, adjusted

0.55
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.43 to 0.71

As randomized, unadjusted

0.56
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.44 to 0.71

Intervention Impact on Bacteriuria and Candiduria

Proportional hazard ratio for as-randomized, unadjusted, ICU-attributable bacteriuria, comparing Baseline to Intervention period across Arms, accounting for clustering by hospital. High-level bacteriuria is defined as ≥50,000 CFU/mL, high-level candiduria is defined as ≥50,000 CFU/mL.

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

Any bacteriuria (all patients)

0.95
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.84 to 1.09

Any bacteriuria (men)

1.01
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.81 to 1.25

Any bacteriuria (women)

0.91
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.77 to 1.08

High-level bacteriuria (all patients)

1.02
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.88 to 1.18

High-level bacteriuria (men)

1.09
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.85 to 1.4

High-level bacteriuria (women)

0.97
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.8 to 1.17

High-level candiduria (all patients)

1.14
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.95 to 1.37

High-level candiduria (men)

1.21
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.88 to 1.68

High-level candiduria (women)

1.09
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.88 to 1.36

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Any bacteriuria (all patients)

0.92
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.8 to 1.04

Any bacteriuria (men)

1.04
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.83 to 1.3

Any bacteriuria (women)

0.86
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.73 to 1.01

High-level bacteriuria (all patients)

0.88
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.76 to 1.02

High-level bacteriuria (men)

1.01
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.79 to 1.29

High-level bacteriuria (women)

0.83
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.7 to 1.0

High-level candiduria (all patients)

0.99
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.83 to 1.18

High-level candiduria (men)

1.01
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.73 to 1.39

High-level candiduria (women)

1.0
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.81 to 1.24

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Any bacteriuria (all patients)

0.86
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.77 to 0.97

Any bacteriuria (men)

0.74
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.61 to 0.9

Any bacteriuria (women)

0.95
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.82 to 1.1

High-level bacteriuria (all patients)

0.87
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.77 to 1.0

High-level bacteriuria (men)

0.78
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.63 to 0.98

High-level bacteriuria (women)

0.93
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.79 to 1.09

High-level candiduria (all patients)

0.83
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.7 to 0.99

High-level candiduria (men)

0.63
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.45 to 0.89

High-level candiduria (women)

0.94
Hazard Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.76 to 1.16

Intervention Impact on Mupirocin Susceptibility of MRSA Isolates

Odds ratio for MRSA+ isolates from ICU patients expressing low-level mupirocin resistance (LLMR) and high-level mupirocin resistance (HLMR), comparing baseline to intervention period across arms, accounting for clustering by hospital.

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

Clinical MRSA: HLMR

0.8
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.11 to 5.68

Clinical MRSA: LLMR

1.0
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.22 to 4.85

ICU-attributable MRSA: HLMR

1.5
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.25 to 9.02

ICU-attributable MRSA: LLMR

1.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.37 to 7.55

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

Clinical MRSA: HLMR

0.8
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.11 to 5.68

Clinical MRSA: LLMR

1.0
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.22 to 4.85

ICU-attributable MRSA: HLMR

1.5
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.25 to 9.02

ICU-attributable MRSA: LLMR

1.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.37 to 7.55

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

Clinical MRSA: HLMR

0.8
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.11 to 5.68

Clinical MRSA: LLMR

1.0
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.22 to 4.85

ICU-attributable MRSA: HLMR

1.5
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.25 to 9.02

ICU-attributable MRSA: LLMR

1.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.37 to 7.55

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Clinical MRSA: HLMR

0.9
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.15 to 5.44

Clinical MRSA: LLMR

1.4
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.34 to 6.14

ICU-attributable MRSA: HLMR

0.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.09 to 5.06

ICU-attributable MRSA: LLMR

0.4
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.01 to 99.0

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Clinical MRSA: HLMR

0.9
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.15 to 5.44

Clinical MRSA: LLMR

1.4
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.34 to 6.14

ICU-attributable MRSA: HLMR

0.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.09 to 5.06

ICU-attributable MRSA: LLMR

0.4
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.01 to 99.0

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Clinical MRSA: HLMR

0.9
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.15 to 5.44

Clinical MRSA: LLMR

1.4
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.34 to 6.14

ICU-attributable MRSA: HLMR

0.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.09 to 5.06

ICU-attributable MRSA: LLMR

0.4
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.01 to 99.0

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Clinical MRSA: HLMR

0.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.16 to 3.01

Clinical MRSA: LLMR

0.5
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.1 to 2.14

ICU-attributable MRSA: HLMR

1.4
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.134 to 15.63

ICU-attributable MRSA: LLMR

0.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.1 to 4.64

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Clinical MRSA: HLMR

0.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.16 to 3.01

Clinical MRSA: LLMR

0.5
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.1 to 2.14

ICU-attributable MRSA: HLMR

1.4
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.134 to 15.63

ICU-attributable MRSA: LLMR

0.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.1 to 4.64

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Clinical MRSA: HLMR

0.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.16 to 3.01

Clinical MRSA: LLMR

0.5
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.1 to 2.14

ICU-attributable MRSA: HLMR

1.4
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.134 to 15.63

ICU-attributable MRSA: LLMR

0.7
Odds Ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.1 to 4.64

MRSA Bloodstream Infection

Hazard ratio for ICU-attributable MRSA+ blood cultures comparing Baseline to Intervention period, by Arm, accounting for clustering by hospital.

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

1.23
hazard ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.82 to 1.85

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

1.23
hazard ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.8 to 1.9

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

0.72
hazard ratio
95% Confidence Interval: 0.48 to 1.08

Intervention Impact on Chlorhexidine Susceptibility of MRSA Isolates

Frequency of MRSA+ isolates from ICU patients with reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine (CHG) (MIC >4 μg/ml), comparing baseline to intervention period across arms, accounting for clustering by hospital.

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

2.0
MRSA isolates non-susceptible to CHG

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

2.0
MRSA isolates non-susceptible to CHG

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

2.0
MRSA isolates non-susceptible to CHG

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Total

122646
Participants

Age, Continuous

Overall Number of Participants, by Phase

Sex/Gender, Customized

Overall Study

Arm 1: Usual Care-Active Surveillance

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization

Arm 3: Universal Decolonization

Drop/Withdrawal Reasons

Arm 2: Targeted Decolonization