Title

High Dose Intravenous Thiamine for the Prevention of Delirium in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of High Dose Intravenous Thiamine for the Prevention of Delirium in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Phase

    Phase 2
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Intervention/Treatment

    Thiamine ...
  • Study Participants

    66
Purpose: To conduct a randomized controlled pilot study investigating the use of high dose intravenous (IV) thiamine to prevent delirium and mitigate the long-term effects of delirium, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and neuropsychiatric outcomes, in patients admitted to University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospital for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Participants: 60 adult inpatients admitted to the UNC Bone Marrow Transplant Unit for allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Procedures (methods): Participants will be admitted for allogeneic HSCT and on the day after transplant randomized to seven days of high dose IV thiamine or placebo. Thiamine levels will be measured weekly and participants will be assessed for evidence of delirium using validated measures. Validated measures will also be used to assess cognitive function, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, functional status, and HRQOL prior to hospitalization and at one, three, and six months after transplant.
Delirium is a common and potentially preventable neuropsychiatric complication in cancer patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that has profound consequences. Among cancer patients hospitalized for HSCT, delirium occurs in approximately 40% of patients and increases the risk of mortality. Long-term, delirium in this population results in worse physical health, mental health, and quality of life. Though strategies to prevent delirium have the potential to significantly improve the lives of people living with cancer, research in this area is extremely limited. Thiamine deficiency is also ubiquitous during HSCT and a known contributor to the development of delirium in other patient populations. High dose intravenous (IV) thiamine is an evidence-based and promising treatment for delirium, but no one has studied IV thiamine as a prevention strategy.

This is a randomized double-blind controlled trial in participants undergoing allogeneic HSCT to determine if high dose IV thiamine can prevent delirium and minimize the deleterious impact of delirium on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and other neuropsychiatric outcomes. The investigators will recruit 60 patients admitted for allogeneic HSCT at UNC, randomize them to treatment with high dose IV thiamine (n = 30) versus placebo (n = 30), and systematically evaluate all participants for delirium and related comorbidities. The investigators will use the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS) to measure the severity and duration of delirium immediately prior to transplant and after HSCT until 30 days post-transplant or discharge. If delirium is identified, the DRS will be administered daily until delirium resolves. The investigators will obtain thiamine levels and other laboratory parameters associated with delirium the day after transplant, and continue to monitor thiamine levels weekly thereafter. The investigators will also monitor HRQOL, functional status, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and cognitive function prior to transplant and at one, three, and six months after transplant to elucidate the persistent impact of delirium in this population and the potential for thiamine to mitigate these negative outcomes.
Study Started
Oct 16
2017
Primary Completion
Mar 02
2020
Study Completion
Aug 10
2020
Results Posted
Apr 26
2021
Last Update
Oct 19
2021

Drug Thiamine

200 mg IV three times daily for seven days

  • Other names: Thiamine Hydrochloride Injection

Drug Normal saline

Normal saline IV three times daily for seven days

  • Other names: Placebo

Intervention Experimental

Thiamine 200 mg IV

Control Placebo Comparator

Normal saline IV

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Admission to the UNC Hospital Bone Marrow Transplant Unit for allogeneic stem cell transplant
At least 18 years of age
Able to speak English
Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

A history of adverse reaction to IV thiamine
Pregnancy, confirmed by a negative pregnancy test within 30 days of study enrollment

Summary

Intervention

Control

All Events

Event Type Organ System Event Term

Percentage of Participants With Delirium

Delirium incidence will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of > 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium incidence will be defined as at least one assessment with DRS > 12.

Control

21.0
percentage of participants

Intervention

25.0
percentage of participants

Delirium Severity

Delirium severity will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The score ranges from 0 to 32 with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of > 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. The DRS medians and ranges are reported for each group at baseline and in each week of hospitalization for thiamine and placebo groups.

Intervention

Baseline

4.0
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 2.0 to 8.0

Week 1

4.83
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 3.0 to 9.0

Week 2

6.5
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 2.67 to 20.33

Week 3

6.33
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 1.0 to 18.6

Week 4

5.5
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 4.0 to 20.0

Week 5

20.0
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 20.0 to 20.0

Control

Baseline

4.0
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 2.0 to 7.0

Week 1

4.67
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 2.67 to 15.0

Week 2

5.33
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 2.33 to 16.0

Week 3

5.17
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 2.0 to 17.8

Week 4

6.0
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 5.0 to 13.5

Week 5

7.5
score on a scale (Median)
Full Range: 4.0 to 8.0

Delirium Duration

Delirium duration will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of > 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium duration will be reported as number of consecutive days during which DRS > 12.

Intervention

2.0
days (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.2

Control

4.4
days (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 4.7

Concentration of Thiamine Status Stratified by Delirium Status

The relationship between thiamine levels at the end of the seven day administration of thiamine and the development of delirium at any point during the thirty days post-transplant or the post-transplant hospitalization, whichever comes first, will be examined. Thiamine levels (nmol/L) are presented in participants who did and did not experience delirium.

Delirium

115.6
nmol/L (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 69.3

No Delirium

93.8
nmol/L (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 28.5

Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 1)

HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.

Intervention

-7.53
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.66

Control

-5.69
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.59

Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 3)

HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.

Intervention

-3.96
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.11

Control

-1.43
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 16.79

Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 6)

HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.

Intervention

-4.36
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.09

Control

0.28
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.17

Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 3)

Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.

Intervention

-0.12
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.97

Control

0.97
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 2.82

Change in Depression Scores (Month 1)

Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.

Intervention

-1.34
T-score (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 8.28

Control

1.16
T-score (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.12

Change in Depression Scores (Month 3)

Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.

Intervention

0.93
T-score (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.24

Control

0.32
T-score (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.53

Change in Depression Scores (Month 6)

Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.

Intervention

0.14
T-score (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.88

Control

-1.66
T-score (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 7.89

Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 1)

Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

Intervention

-0.52
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.88

Control

1.55
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.92

Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 3)

Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

Intervention

-1.5
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.58

Control

0.83
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.63

Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 6)

Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.

Intervention

1.79
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.14

Control

1.32
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 7.00

Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 1)

Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.

Intervention

-0.7
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 3.35

Control

-0.09
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 2.76

Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 6)

Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.

Intervention

0.71
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 3.32

Control

1.54
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 2.87

Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 1)

Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.

Intervention

0.7
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.67

Control

0.88
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.93

Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 3)

Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.

Intervention

0.69
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.62

Control

0.6
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.89

Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 6)

Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.

Intervention

0.46
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.93

Control

0.21
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.63

Total

61
Participants

Age, Continuous

54.2
years (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 13.6

Education

15.0
years (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 2.7

CIBMTR Disease Risk Index

Conditioning Regimen

Diagnosis

Donor Type

ECOG Score

Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)

Race (NIH/OMB)

Region of Enrollment

Sex: Female, Male

Inpatient Phase

Intervention

Control

1-month Follow-Up

Intervention

Control

3-month Follow-Up

Intervention

Control

6-month Follow-Up

Intervention

Control

Drop/Withdrawal Reasons

Intervention

Control