Title

PK, PD, Safety, and Efficacy of SAIT101 Versus MabThera® Versus Rituxan® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Efficacy of SAIT101 Versus MabThera® Versus Rituxan® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
  • Phase

    Phase 1
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Intervention/Treatment

    rituximab ...
  • Study Participants

    294
A randomised, double blind, parallel group, multicentre study yo compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of SAIT101 versus MabThera® versus Rituxan® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, efficacy, tolerability, and immunogenicity of SAIT101 (biosimilar rituximab) versus MabThera® versus Rituxan® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study will take place globally across approximately 75 study centers in order to randomize approximately 282 patients. The study consists of Part A from baseline for PK and efficacy analysis, followed by Part B from Week 24 to 52 for safety follow-up in which collects transition data.
Study Started
Oct 11
2016
Primary Completion
Apr 30
2018
Study Completion
Nov 07
2018
Results Posted
Feb 17
2020
Last Update
Feb 17
2020

Biological SAIT101

1,000 mg i.v. of SAIT101 on Day 1 and 15. 1,000 mg i.v. of SAIT101 on week 24 and 26 for eligible patients.

Biological MabThera

1,000 mg i.v. of MabThera® on Day 1 and 15. 1,000 mg i.v. of MabThera® on week 24 and 26 for eligible patients.

  • Other names: Rituximab

Biological Rituxan

1,000 mg i.v. of Rituxan® on Day 1 and 15. 1,000 mg i.v. of Rituxan® on week 24 and 26 for eligible patients.

  • Other names: Rituximab

SAIT101 Experimental

In Part A, each patient will receive one course of two 1000 mg SAIT101 infusions: one on Day 1 and the second on Day 15. In Part B, patients with an inadequate response (<50% improvement from Baseline in swollen and tender joint count at Week 24) will be eligible for a further course of two 1000 mg infusions of SAIT101 on Week 24 and Week 26.

Rituxan Active Comparator

In Part A, each patient will receive one course of two 1000 mg Rituxan infusions: one on Day 1 and the second on Day 15. In Part B, patients with an inadequate response (<50% improvement from Baseline in swollen and tender joint count at Week 24) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive Rituxan or SAIT101 10000 mg infusions on Week 24 and Week 26.

MabThera Active Comparator

In Part A, each patient will receive one course of two 1000 mg MabThera infusions: one on Day 1 and the second on Day 15. In Part B, patients with an inadequate response (<50% improvement from Baseline in swollen and tender joint count at Week 24) will be eligible for a further course of two 1000 mg infusions of MabThera on Week 24 and Week 26.

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Severe RA defined as:

Diagnosis of RA according to the revised (1987) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of RA for at least 3 months prior to screening visit (see Appendix 3).
And ≥6 swollen joints and ≥6 tender/painful joints (from the 66/68 joint count system).
And C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1.0 mg/dL or an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hour at Screening.

And positive rheumatoid factor (RF) (≥20 units/mL) or anti cyclic citrullinase peptide (CCP) antibodies (≥10 units/mL) at Screening.

2. Patients with severe RA who have had an inadequate response to at least 3 months' treatment (according to the approved treatment and dosage) or intolerance (at Investigator's discretion and/or experience of intolerable AE or toxicity such as infusion related reaction, hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis or severe toxicity) to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy (experience of severe adverse event (AE) or toxicity).

3. Current treatment for RA on an outpatient basis:

Receiving methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 - 25mg/week (oral or parenteral) for at least 12 weeks, including the last 4 weeks prior to Day 1 at a stable dose, via the same route of administration, dose, and formulation. Patients receiving a lower dose of MTX (<10 mg/week), stable for 4 weeks prior to Day 1, should be doing so as a result of a documented evidence of intolerance to higher doses of MTX.

Exclusion Criteria:

Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the Treatment Period of and 12 months after the last infusion of study drug.
Class IV as per the Classification of Global Functional Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis (as per ACR 1991 Revised Criteria) (see Appendix 4) or wheelchair/bed bound.
History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA (including but not limited to gout, reactive arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy or Lyme disease).
History of or current systemic autoimmune disorder (including but not limited to systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, pulmonary fibrosis, Felty syndrome, scleroderma, inflammatory myopathy, fibromyalgia, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, mixed connective tissue disease, vasculitis or other overlap syndrome), with the exception of the secondary Sjögren's syndrome.
Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of, or currently active), including known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive test at screening.
History of opportunistic infection.
History of deep space/tissue infection (e.g., fasciitis, abscess, osteomyelitis) and infected prosthetic joint.
Active infection of any kind (excluding fungal infection of nail beds) or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with i.v. anti infective agents within 4 weeks prior to Screening or oral anti-infective agents within 2 weeks prior to Screening or use of antibiotic therapy three or more times in the last six months prior to Screening

Positive serological test for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) or hepatitis C serology.

Patients with a negative HBsAg and positive HBcAb must have a hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) level <20 IU/mL (or 112 copies/mL) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These HBV patients must be willing to undergo monthly PCR HBV DNA testing during treatment and may participate following consultation with a hepatitis expert regarding monitoring and use of HBV antiviral therapy, and provided they agree to receive treatment as indicated. An HBV re-test will be performed monthly including Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, 52, and unscheduled visit if required.
Patients with a positive test because of HBV vaccine may be included (i.e., anti-HBs+ and anti HBc-).
Patients positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody are eligible only if PCR is negative for HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA).

Confirmed current active tuberculosis (TB). • Patients with latent TB as determined by positive QuantiFERON-TB test may be enrolled if such patients have written confirmation from health care provider (e.g., Pulmonologist or Infection Specialist) of adequate prophylaxis before or within the screening period and no evidence of tuberculosis on a chest X-ray performed within 3 months from Day 1.

• Screening period can be extended to 60 days for prophylaxis of latent TB.

• QuantiFERON-TB test can be re-tested, if inconclusive.

Any significant cardiac disease (e.g., coronary artery disease with unstable angina, coronary heart failure New York Heart Association Class III and IV, familial long QT syndrome, uncontrolled cardiac disease).
History of moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or history of severe COPD exacerbation(s) within the last 12 months of Screening.
Vaccination with live or attenuated vaccines within 6 weeks prior to first dose of study drug or planned administration during study participation or within 4 weeks following last dose of study drug. Treatment with IV Gamma Globulin or the Prosorba® Column within 6 months prior to Day 1.
History of a severe allergic reaction or anaphylactic reaction to a biological agent or history of hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug including known hypersensitivity or allergy to a murine product.
Hypogammaglobulinemia at screening (Immunoglobulin G (IgG) <600 mg/dL).
Patients with hemoglobin <8.5 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1,500 cells/µL or platelet count <75,000 cells/µL at Screening. If a patient has findings marginally below this limit, re testing is allowed, at the Investigator's discretion, within the 30 day period between Visit 1 and Visit 2.

• Creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)

• Liver function: Total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL (>34 µmol/L) except for patients with Gilbert's Syndrome or hemolysis. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 × upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients with total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL possibly due to Gilbert's Syndrome should have a direct bilirubin checked. If the direct bilirubin is normal and medical history is suggestive/positive for Gilbert's Syndrome, the patient successfully meets the criteria.

The AST and ALT may be repeated once within the Screening period if the initial result exceeds this limit, and the lesser value accepted if it meets this criterion.

18. History of cancer within the last 5 years prior to Screening, treated with anti-cancer chemotherapy, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies and carcinoma in situ (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri that have been excised and cured).

19. Major surgical procedure within 4 weeks prior to or planned within 24 weeks of Day 1, with the exception of surgical procedures for dental prosthesis.

20. Previous treatment with a B cell modulating or B cell depletion therapy, such as, but not limited to rituximab, belimumab, atacicept, tabalumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, epratuzumab and other experimental treatments.

21. Injectable corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to Day 1.

22. Participation in a previous clinical study within 4 weeks of Screening or having received treatment with a drug that has not received regulatory approval for any indication within a minimum of 5 half-lives prior to Day 1.

23. Patients who, based on the Investigator's judgment, have a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that may preclude safe and complete study participation. Conditions may also include cardiovascular, vascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, endocrine or neurological conditions as determined by medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests or electrocardiogram (ECG).

24. Patients who, in the judgment of the Investigator, are likely to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study.

25. History of substance abuse (alcohol or drug).

26. History of demyelinating disorders (such as multiple sclerosis or Guillain-Barré syndrome).

27. Patients at risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML):

Patients with immune deficiency such as transplant patients on immunosuppressive medications
Patients receiving certain kinds of chemotherapy
Patients receiving natalizumab (Tysabri®) for multiple sclerosis
Patients with psoriasis on longer term efalizumab (Raptiva®) or patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)

Summary

SAIT101

MabThera

Rituxan

All Events

Event Type Organ System Event Term SAIT101 MabThera Rituxan

Area Under the Concentration Time Cure From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t)

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (immediately predose on Day 1) to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t). Geometric means by treatment (Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set).

SAIT101

144500.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 34.2

MabThera

151600.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 33.2

Rituxan

154600.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 35.6

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-∞)

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area Under the Plasma Concentration from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ (infinity). Calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation and extrapolated to infinity by addition of the last quantifiable concentration divided by the elimination rate constant: AUC(0-last) + C(last)/λz.

SAIT101

152300.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 34.6

MabThera

161900.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 32.2

Rituxan

161300.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 33.3

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-D15)

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area Under the Concentration verses time from time 0 to Day 15 prior to infusion (AUC0-D15) calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation. Actual time/concentration on Day 15 was used for the calculation of this parameter unless the parameter was derived by interpolation.

Rituxan

43540.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 24.1

SAIT101

42950.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 26.7

MabThera

44600.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 25.6

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Day 15 Infusion

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) after Day 15 infusion (Dose 2)

SAIT101

406.0
µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 28.3

MabThera

427.7
µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 28.3

Rituxan

411.1
µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 24.5

Trough Concentration (Ctrough) Before the Second Infusion on Day 15

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Trough concentration (Ctrough) before the second infusion on Day 15 (Dose 2). Trough (pre-dose) concentration prior to second infusion on Day 15 obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.

SAIT101

60.35
µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 40.3

MabThera

67.75
µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 36.2

Rituxan

58.84
µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 97.9

Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24

Disease Activity Score 28 C-reactive protein score (DAS28-CRP) at Week 24 (Full Analysis Set). CRP samples were collected at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16 and 24. DAS28-CRP was calculated using the following equation: [0.56*Square Root (SQRT) (tender 28 joint count)+0.28*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.36*ln(CRP+1)]*1.10+1.15. Total DAS28-CRP scores were calculates and range from 2.0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). Lower scores represent a better patient outcome. Disease remission is considered achieved if the score is between 0 and <2.6. Low disease activity corresponds to 2.6 to <3.2. Moderate activity is between 3.2 & ≤5.1, while high activity is above 5.1.

SAIT101

-0.991
Score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1735

MabThera

-0.832
Score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.8483

Rituxan

-0.861
Score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.9488

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Week 2 to Week 24 (AUC(w2-24)

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration time curve week 2 to week 24 (AUC(w2-24) calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation.

SAIT101

107300.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 41.1

MabThera

109200.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 40.0

Rituxan

116000.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 40.2

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Day 0 to Week 12 (AUC(0-w12))

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration time curve Day 0 to Week 12 calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation.

SAIT101

148500.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 33.1

MabThera

157400.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 30.3

Rituxan

155900.0
h*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 33.1

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Dose 1)

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Maximum plasma concentration over the first dosing interval obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.

SAIT101

5.167
Hours (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 3.0 to 6.5

MabThera

5.167
Hours (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 3.0 to 358.75

Rituxan

4.5
Hours (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 3.0 to 6.75

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Dose 2)

Time of maximum concentration postinfusion over the second dosing interval, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.

SAIT101

4.167
Hours (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 2.92 to 5.5

MabThera

4.167
Hours (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 0.0 to 48.08

Rituxan

4.25
Hours (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 2.92 to 23.5

Apparent Terminal Rate Constant (λz)

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Apparent terminal rate constant (λz) determined by linear regression of the terminal points of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Best fit method followed by visual assessment was used to identify the terminal linear phase of the concentration-time profile. A minimum of 3 data points was used for determination.

SAIT101

0.002358
1/hr (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.00061132

MabThera

0.002283
1/hr (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.00067311

Rituxan

0.00224
1/hr (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.00059435

Systemic Clearance (CL)

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Systemic clearance (CL) over the first dosing period calculated as dose (first + second dose) divided by AUC(0-∞).

SAIT101

0.01314
L/day (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 34.6

MabThera

0.01235
L/day (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 29.0

Rituxan

0.0124
L/day (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 33.3

Volume of Distribution (VD)

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Volume of distribution (VD) over the first dosing period calculated as dose (first + second dose) divided by [λz AUC(0-∞)]

SAIT101

5.757
Litres (L) (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 28.0

MabThera

5.635
Litres (L) (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 23.6

Rituxan

5.727
Litres (L) (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 22.9

Terminal Half-life (T1/2)

Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Terminal half-life determined as ln2/λz.

SAIT101

303.7
Hours (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 26.1

MabThera

316.1
Hours (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 29.0

Rituxan

319.7
Hours (Geometric Mean)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation: 26.2

Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Weeks 8, 16, 36 and 52

Disease Activity Score 28-C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) samples taken at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. DAS28-CRP was calculated using the following equation: [0.56*Square Root (SQRT) (tender 28 joint count)+0.28*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.36*ln(CRP+1)]*1.10+1.15. Total DAS28-CRP scores are presented and range from 2.0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). Lower scores represent a better patient outcome. Disease remission is considered achieved if the score is between 0 and <2.6. Low disease activity corresponds to 2.6 to <3.2. Moderate activity is between 3.2 & ≤5.1, while high activity is above 5.1.

SAIT101

Day 1 (Baseline)

5.282
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.8899

Week 16

4.001
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1116

Week 24

4.3
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.0331

Week 36

3.552
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1452

Week 52 (End of Study(

3.66
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.2636

Week 8

4.405
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.0189

MabThera

Day 1 (Baseline)

5.288
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.8073

Week 16

4.155
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.9750

Week 24

4.463
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.0648

Week 36

3.823
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.9290

Week 52 (End of Study(

3.754
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.3037

Week 8

4.324
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1132

Rituxan

Day 1 (Baseline)

5.17
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.8326

Week 16

4.1
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.0044

Week 24

4.443
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.9774

Week 36

3.716
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.0684

Week 52 (End of Study(

3.518
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1276

Week 8

4.251
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1392

American Collage of Rheumatology 20% Response Criteria (ACR20) Response Rates at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52

American Collage of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response criteria (ACR20) response rates were assessed at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. An ACR20 response is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP).

SAIT101

ACR20 Week 16

50.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 43.18 to 62.95

ACR20 Week 24

36.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 28.79 to 49.35

ACR20 Week 36

63.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 59.87 to 78.49

ACR20 Week 52 (EOS)

60.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 53.75 to 72.82

ACR20 Week 8

39.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 31.7 to 51.1

MabThera

ACR20 Week 16

54.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 48.48 to 68.21

ACR20 Week 24

31.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 26.37 to 46.11

ACR20 Week 36

47.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 46.52 to 67.46

ACR20 Week 52 (EOS)

49.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 44.18 to 64.34

ACR20 Week 8

33.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 26.51 to 45.61

Rituxan

ACR20 Week 16

53.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 47.98 to 67.84

ACR20 Week 24

34.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 29.86 to 50.1

ACR20 Week 36

58.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 58.0 to 78.69

ACR20 Week 52 (EOS)

59.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 55.98 to 75.26

ACR20 Week 8

44.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 37.91 to 57.91

American Collage of Rheumatology 50% Response Criteria (ACR50) Response Rates and American Collage of Rheumatology 70% Response Criteria (ACR70) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52

Efficacy endpoint: American Collage of Rheumatology 50% response criteria (ACR50) response rates and American Collage of Rheumatology 70% response criteria (ACR70) at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. An ACR50 response is defined as both improvement of 50% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). An ACR70 response is defined as both improvement of 70% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP).

SAIT101

ACR50 Week 16

17.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 11.61 to 27.07

ACR50 Week 24

15.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 10.14 to 25.17

ACR50 Week 36

37.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 31.51 to 51.44

ACR50 Week 52 (EOS)

35.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 28.14 to 47.33

ACR50 Week 8

13.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 8.17 to 22.02

ACR70 Week 16

9.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 5.12 to 17.2

ACR70 Week 24

8.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 4.47 to 16.23

ACR70 Week 36

19.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 13.95 to 30.63

ACR70 Week 52 (EOS)

23.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 16.89 to 34.05

ACR70 Week 8

2.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.58 to 7.35

MabThera

ACR50 Week 16

16.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 11.0 to 26.4

ACR50 Week 24

8.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 4.73 to 17.11

ACR50 Week 36

19.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 15.37 to 33.38

ACR50 Week 52 (EOS)

25.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 19.58 to 37.8

ACR50 Week 8

11.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 6.73 to 19.95

ACR70 Week 16

4.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 1.7 to 10.65

ACR70 Week 24

2.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.63 to 8.0

ACR70 Week 36

6.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 3.4 to 15.06

ACR70 Week 52 (EOS)

13.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 8.64 to 23.16

ACR70 Week 8

2.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.59 to 7.51

Rituxan

ACR50 Week 16

14.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 9.39 to 24.18

ACR50 Week 24

5.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 2.51 to 12.9

ACR50 Week 36

25.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 21.31 to 40.69

ACR50 Week 52 (EOS)

30.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 24.74 to 44.02

ACR50 Week 8

14.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 9.29 to 23.94

ACR70 Week 16

5.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 2.37 to 12.22

ACR70 Week 24

3.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 1.19 to 9.76

ACR70 Week 36

12.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 8.47 to 23.59

ACR70 Week 52 (EOS)

17.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 12.28 to 28.48

ACR70 Week 8

2.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.6 to 7.58

Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) and Tender Joint Count (TJC) (the 66/68 Joint Count System)

Efficacy endpoint: Individual components of the ACR improvement criteria on Day 1 and at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) (the 66/68 joint count system). SJC and TJC assess the level of skeletal disease involvement. The 66/68 Joint Count evaluates 66 joints for swelling and 68 joints for tenderness.

SAIT101

Swollen Joint Count 16

6.5
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 4.86

Swollen Joint Count 24

8.5
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.13

Swollen Joint Count 36

4.8
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.21

Swollen Joint Count Day 1

15.2
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 7.97

Swollen Joint Count Week 52 (EOS)

5.2
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.53

Swollen Joint Count Week 8

8.6
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 7.11

Tender Joint Count Day 1

21.7
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.08

Tender Joint Count Week 16

11.1
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.24

Tender Joint Score Week 24

13.6
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.79

Tender Joint Score Week 36

8.3
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.10

Tender Joint Score Week 52 (EOS)

9.3
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.34

Tender Joint Score Week 8

13.9
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.94

MabThera

Swollen Joint Count 16

7.8
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 7.20

Swollen Joint Count 24

10.0
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.85

Swollen Joint Count 36

5.4
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.72

Swollen Joint Count Day 1

15.2
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.2

Swollen Joint Count Week 52 (EOS)

6.5
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.46

Swollen Joint Count Week 8

8.4
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.62

Tender Joint Count Day 1

22.6
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 13.66

Tender Joint Count Week 16

12.5
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 8.36

Tender Joint Score Week 24

15.6
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.94

Tender Joint Score Week 36

10.9
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.68

Tender Joint Score Week 52 (EOS)

11.9
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.18

Tender Joint Score Week 8

14.0
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.94

Rituxan

Swollen Joint Count 16

7.0
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.37

Swollen Joint Count 24

10.0
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.19

Swollen Joint Count 36

5.7
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.49

Swollen Joint Count Day 1

13.0
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.19

Swollen Joint Count Week 52 (EOS)

4.6
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.04

Swollen Joint Count Week 8

7.7
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.92

Tender Joint Count Day 1

20.0
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.84

Tender Joint Count Week 16

11.8
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.09

Tender Joint Score Week 24

15.2
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.62

Tender Joint Score Week 36

9.6
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.81

Tender Joint Score Week 52 (EOS)

9.4
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.41

Tender Joint Score Week 8

13.5
Joints (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.69

Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS])

Efficacy endpoint: Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Physicians global assessment of disease activity (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = maximum disease activity.

SAIT101

Disease Activity Week 24

47.9
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 22.28

Disease Activity Week 52 (EOS)

31.1
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 21.67

Disease Activity Week 8

45.6
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 20.75

Disease Activtiy Week 16

39.2
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 20.94

Disease Activtiy Week 36

30.3
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 21.56

Disease Activty iDay 1

71.0
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 14.30

MabThera

Disease Activity Week 24

47.8
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 20.25

Disease Activity Week 52 (EOS)

35.1
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 23.49

Disease Activity Week 8

43.2
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 23.86

Disease Activtiy Week 16

39.0
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 20.97

Disease Activtiy Week 36

36.3
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 21.71

Disease Activty iDay 1

69.4
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 15.00

Rituxan

Disease Activity Week 24

49.0
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 22.45

Disease Activity Week 52 (EOS)

31.2
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 22.95

Disease Activity Week 8

44.6
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 23.28

Disease Activtiy Week 16

42.3
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 20.89

Disease Activtiy Week 36

31.4
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 20.69

Disease Activty iDay 1

69.8
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Error: 14.32

Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Assessment of Pain (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS])

Participants assessment of pain (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Participants assessment of pain (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) where 0 = no pain and 100 = severe pain.

SAIT101

Assessment of Pain Day 1

67.0
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 18.71

Assessment of Pain Week 16

42.7
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23.34

Assessment of Pain Week 24

49.3
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 24.15

Assessment of Pain Week 36

36.8
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 24.56

Assessment of Pain Week 52 (EOS)

41.2
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 24.34

Assessment of Pain Week 8

48.4
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22.79

MabThera

Assessment of Pain Day 1

68.8
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.02

Assessment of Pain Week 16

44.6
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.91

Assessment of Pain Week 24

51.6
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 21.44

Assessment of Pain Week 36

44.9
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23.78

Assessment of Pain Week 52 (EOS)

43.2
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 24.42

Assessment of Pain Week 8

50.4
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22.40

Rituxan

Assessment of Pain Day 1

68.8
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 19.27

Assessment of Pain Week 16

44.4
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22.91

Assessment of Pain Week 24

51.8
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23.58

Assessment of Pain Week 36

41.6
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23.46

Assessment of Pain Week 52 (EOS)

44.5
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 26.10

Assessment of Pain Week 8

47.9
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23.03

Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Global Assessment of Disease Activity (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm VAS)

Efficacy endpoint: Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants global assessment of disease activity (assessed on 1 to 100 mm visual analogue scale [VAS]). Patients rate how their Rheumatoid Arthritis has affected them, where 0 = very well and 100 = very poor.

SAIT101

Disease activity Day 1

68.9
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.87

Disease activity Week 16

43.9
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 21.47

Disease activity Week 24

50.8
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23.16

Disease activity Week 36

35.7
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22.63

Disease activity Week 52 (EOS)

41.4
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23.02

Disease activity Week 8

46.9
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22.57

MabThera

Disease activity Day 1

67.6
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 17.53

Disease activity Week 16

44.4
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 21.63

Disease activity Week 24

51.1
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.49

Disease activity Week 36

42.7
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22.54

Disease activity Week 52 (EOS)

42.4
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 24.10

Disease activity Week 8

49.1
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22.98

Rituxan

Disease activity Day 1

70.8
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 17.04

Disease activity Week 16

44.2
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22.82

Disease activity Week 24

52.3
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 21.90

Disease activity Week 36

42.5
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23.70

Disease activity Week 52 (EOS)

43.1
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23.93

Disease activity Week 8

48.5
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22.93

Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Assessment of Disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI])

the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) contains 20 questions split into 8 categories (dressing & grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip & activities). Scores were: 0 = Without ANY Difficulty; 1 = With SOME Difficulty; 2 = With MUCH Difficulty; 3 = UNABLE to Do. Total scores were calculated as the summed category scores divided by the number of categories. Total HAQ-DI scores are presented which range from 0 to 3. Higher scores represent a worse outcome. Scores of 0 to 1 represent mild to moderate difficulty, 1 to 2 moderate disability, and 2 to 3 severe to very severe disability.

SAIT101

HAQ-DI Day 1

1.61
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.5728

HAQ-DI Week 16

1.129
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.5775

HAQ-DI Week 24

1.209
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6071

HAQ-DI Week 36

0.994
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6220

HAQ-DI Week 52 (EOS)

1.027
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6208

HAQ-DI Week 8

1.168
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6318

MabThera

HAQ-DI Day 1

1.605
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6567

HAQ-DI Week 16

1.246
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6394

HAQ-DI Week 24

1.335
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6381

HAQ-DI Week 36

1.182
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6883

HAQ-DI Week 52 (EOS)

1.207
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.7025

HAQ-DI Week 8

1.314
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6919

Rituxan

HAQ-DI Day 1

1.585
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6421

HAQ-DI Week 16

1.152
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6668

HAQ-DI Week 24

1.294
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6594

HAQ-DI Week 36

1.061
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6247

HAQ-DI Week 52 (EOS)

1.19
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.7116

HAQ-DI Week 8

1.176
score on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6398

Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level

C-reactive protein (CRP) level (Mg/L). CRP is a marker for inflammation. a normal reading is <3 Mg/L. Higher values indicate disease related inflammation and increased cardiovascular risk. CRP levels between 3 Mg/L and 10 Mg/L are mildly elevated. Levels between 10 Mg/L and 100 Mg/L are moderately elevated and CRP levels above 100 Mg/L are severely elevated.

SAIT101

CRP Day 1

19.5
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 28.99

CRP Week 16

8.5
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.78

CRP Week 24

9.5
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.54

CRP Week 36

8.0
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.33

CRP Week 52 (EOS)

9.8
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.14

CRP Week 8

12.5
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.78

MabThera

CRP Day 1

15.3
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.63

CRP Week 16

7.2
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.02

CRP Week 24

8.3
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.40

CRP Week 36

7.0
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.38

CRP Week 52 (EOS)

9.1
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.93

CRP Week 8

12.3
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.29

Rituxan

CRP Day 1

16.2
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 17.91

CRP Week 16

7.3
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.90

CRP Week 24

7.9
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.35

CRP Week 36

7.1
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.72

CRP Week 52 (EOS)

7.4
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.34

CRP Week 8

10.4
Mg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.78

Change From Baseline DAS28-erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52

Disease Activity Score 28- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) consisted of tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC) & erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The formula is: [0.56*SQRT(tender 28 joint count)+0.28*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.7*ln(ESR)]+0.014*patient global health assessment. Total DAS28-ESR scores are presented. Total scores range from 2 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). A lower score represents a better patient outcome. A DAS28-ESR of greater than 5.1 implies active disease, less than 3.2 low disease activity, and less than 2.6 remission.

SAIT101

DAS28-ESR Day 1

6.537
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.8440

DAS28-ESR Week 16

4.861
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1876

DAS28-ESR Week 24

5.216
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.2510

DAS28-ESR Week 36

4.319
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.2798

DAS28-ESR Week 52 (EOS)

4.435
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.4375

DAS28-ESR Week 8

5.33
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.0649

MabThera

DAS28-ESR Day 1

6.533
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: .07810

DAS28-ESR Week 16

5.059
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1682

DAS28-ESR Week 24

5.41
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.2344

DAS28-ESR Week 36

4.689
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.0077

DAS28-ESR Week 52 (EOS)

4.485
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.4390

DAS28-ESR Week 8

5.315
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.2478

Rituxan

DAS28-ESR Day 1

6.48
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.7577

DAS28-ESR Week 16

4.957
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1802

DAS28-ESR Week 24

5.432
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1891

DAS28-ESR Week 36

4.499
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.1980

DAS28-ESR Week 52 (EOS)

4.391
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.3947

DAS28-ESR Week 8

5.235
score on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.2578

Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response (Continuous ACR70) for at Least 24 Weeks

Efficacy endpoint: number of participants with a major clinical response defined as a continuous ACR70 from Baseline (Day 1) for at least 24 weeks. ACR70 is a measure based on American College of Rheumatology criteria of at least a 70% improvement in the number of tender and swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in at least 3 of the following: the patient's global assessment of disease status; the patient's assessment of pain; the patient's assessment of function measured using the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire the physician's global assessment of disease status; serum C-reactive protein levels.

SAIT101

Major Clinical Response Week 24

1.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.19 to 5.9

Major Clinical Response Week 52 (EOS)

2.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.62 to 7.83

MabThera

Major Clinical Response Week 24

Major Clinical Response Week 52 (EOS)

Rituxan

Major Clinical Response Week 24

Major Clinical Response Week 52 (EOS)

1.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.22 to 6.75

Number of Participants With a Clinical Remission Response (CRR) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52

Number if Participants with a Clinical Remission Response (CRR) defined by the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <3.3 at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS).

SAIT101

CRR Week 16

CRR Week 24

CRR Week 36

2.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.61 to 7.74

CRR Week 52 (EOS)

1.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.19 to 5.9

CRR Week 8

MabThera

CRR Week 16

1.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.19 to 5.84

CRR Week 24

1.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.2 to 6.23

CRR Week 36

CRR Week 52 (EOS)

2.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.63 to 7.91

CRR Week 8

Rituxan

CRR Week 16

CRR Week 24

CRR Week 36

1.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.21 to 6.51

CRR Week 52 (EOS)

2.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 0.64 to 8.09

CRR Week 8

Proportion of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 8, 16, 24 36 and 52

Efficacy endpoint: Proportion of participants with European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response (defined as good response, moderate response or no response) at weeks 8, 16, 24 36 and 52 (EOS). EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response was classified using the individual amount of change in the DAS28-CRP score. The DAS28-CRP was classified into 3 categories: low disease activity (<= 3.2), moderate disease activity (> 3.2 and <= 5.1) and high disease activity (> 5.1). Good response was defined as >1.2 improvement in the DAS28-CRP from baseline with low disease activity.

SAIT101

Week 16 Good

20.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 14.38 to 30.9

Week 16 Good or Moderate

44.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 37.47 to 57.36

Week 24 Good

12.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 7.71 to 21.65

Week 24 Good or Moderate

30.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 24.17 to 43.14

Week 36 Good

27.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 21.51 to 40.13

Week 36 Good or Moderate

58.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 54.15 to 73.56

Week 52 (EOS) Good

34.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 27.8 to 47.16

Week 52 (EOS) Good or Moderate

59.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 53.95 to 73.18

Week 8 Good

12.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 7.54 to 21.21

Week 8 Good or Moderate

30.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 23.62 to 42.3

MabThera

Week 16 Good

12.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 7.62 to 21.43

Week 16 Good or Moderate

42.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 35.85 to 55.8

Week 24 Good

7.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 3.95 to 15.69

Week 24 Good or Moderate

26.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 21.28 to 40.19

Week 36 Good

15.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 11.41 to 28.01

Week 36 Good or Moderate

50.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 50.0 to 70.82

Week 52 (EOS) Good

31.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 26.37 to 46.11

Week 52 (EOS) Good or Moderate

50.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 46.98 to 67.33

Week 8 Good

14.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 9.29 to 23.94

Week 8 Good or Moderate

33.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 26.82 to 46.05

Rituxan

Week 16 Good

13.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 8.45 to 22.69

Week 16 Good or Moderate

33.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 26.82 to 46.05

Week 24 Good

7.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 4.05 to 16.04

Week 24 Good or Moderate

23.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 18.76 to 37.34

Week 36 Good

27.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 23.13 to 42.72

Week 36 Good or Moderate

54.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 53.62 to 73.7

Week 52 (EOS) Good

32.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 27.41 to 47.27

Week 52 (EOS) Good or Moderate

63.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 62.23 to 80.71

Week 8 Good

12.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 7.54 to 21.21

Week 8 Good or Moderate

33.0
participants
95% Confidence Interval: 26.51 to 45.61

Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM and IgA Levels)

Change from baseline (Day 1) in immunoglobulin G (IgG), Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels (mg/dL) at Week 8, 16, 24 36 and 52 (End of study)

SAIT101

IgA Screening

321.1
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 269.22

IgA Week 16

301.8
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 204.14

IgA Week 24

279.8
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 119.87

IgA Week 36

283.8
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 204.12

IgA Week 52

269.4
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 116.74

IgA Week 8

293.6
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 176.04

IgG Screening

1231.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 299.36

IgG Week 16

1105.2
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 232.51

IgG Week 24

1114.6
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 251.78

IgG Week 36

1076.6
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 246.62

IgG Week 52 (EOS)

1102.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 274.44

IgG Week 8

1108.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 242.20

IgM Screening

164.3
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 76.07

IgM Week 16

123.7
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 61.08

IgM Week 24

123.3
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 62.37

IgM Week 36

111.7
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 56.89

IgM Week 52 (EOS)

109.6
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 56.80

IgM Week 8

137.5
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 71.38

MabThera

IgA Screening

283.4
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 134.80

IgA Week 16

253.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 111.58

IgA Week 24

263.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 121.15

IgA Week 36

259.2
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 116.55

IgA Week 52

254.7
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 115.38

IgA Week 8

264.4
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 121.41

IgG Screening

1230.1
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 365.54

IgG Week 16

1075.7
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 277.51

IgG Week 24

1077.2
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 265.55

IgG Week 36

1060.9
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 305.12

IgG Week 52 (EOS)

1081.1
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 285.13

IgG Week 8

1080.6
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 279.75

IgM Screening

167.9
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 100.16

IgM Week 16

124.9
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 85.71

IgM Week 24

117.1
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 80.96

IgM Week 36

108.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 77.79

IgM Week 52 (EOS)

107.6
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 77.00

IgM Week 8

132.6
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 83.58

Rituxan

IgA Screening

342.9
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 153.24

IgA Week 16

312.7
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 151.87

IgA Week 24

307.7
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 147.92

IgA Week 36

297.1
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 146.85

IgA Week 52

297.8
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 138.63

IgA Week 8

316.5
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 146.15

IgG Screening

1203.4
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 373.29

IgG Week 16

1038.5
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 290.01

IgG Week 24

1023.2
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 278.70

IgG Week 36

976.6
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 249.11

IgG Week 52 (EOS)

999.9
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 232.03

IgG Week 8

1038.5
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 290.01

IgM Screening

159.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 81.36

IgM Week 16

117.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 60.44

IgM Week 24

109.9
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 73.11

IgM Week 36

99.7
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 56.38

IgM Week 52 (EOS)

95.2
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 52.57

IgM Week 8

128.9
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 68.50

Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Depletion of B-lymphocyte Antigen CD19 (CD19+) B-cell Count up to Week 24

Pharmacodynamic endpoint: proportion of participants (n) with depletion of CD19+ B-cell count up to week 24 (Pharmacodynamic analysis set).

SAIT101

45.0
participants

MabThera

46.0
participants

Rituxan

50.0
participants

Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Time Needed to CD19+ B-cell Depletion

Time needed to CD19+ B-cell depletion in Part A (calculated as the first time CD19+ B-cell count below 20/µL minus time of first dosing in days).

SAIT101

1.524
Days (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 2.6274

MabThera

2.847
Days (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.1286

Rituxan

2.223
Days (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.0833

Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Duration of CD19+ B-cell Depletion

Duration of CD19+ B-cell depletion (only participants that returned to non-depletion at or before week 24 were included)

Rituxan

77.29
Days (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 72.0557

SAIT101

78.444
Days (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 77.5290

MabThera

85.856
Days (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 73.4460

Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Number of Participants With CD19+ B-cell Count Recover Versus Baseline

Number of participants with CD19+ B-cell count recover versus baseline. Incidence of B-Cell recovery was defined as either CD19+ B-cell counts retuned to baseline or the lower limit or normal of 110 cells/µL at week 24).

SAIT101

MabThera

Rituxan

Pharmaco Endpoint: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve of CD19 B-cell Count Change at Day 15 and Week 24

Area under the concentration time curve of CD19 B-cell count change at Day 15 (AUEC0-d15) and week 24 (AUEC0-w24) based on change from baseline and percent of baseline values

SAIT101

AUEC(0-d15)

-2650.0
cells*day/µL) (Least Squares Mean)
95% Confidence Interval: -2786.0 to -2513.9

AUEC(0-w24)

-32707.6
cells*day/µL) (Least Squares Mean)
95% Confidence Interval: -33128.1 to -32287.1

MabThera

AUEC(0-d15)

-2672.1
cells*day/µL) (Least Squares Mean)
95% Confidence Interval: -2804.9 to -2539.3

AUEC(0-w24)

-33018.3
cells*day/µL) (Least Squares Mean)
95% Confidence Interval: -33440.4 to -32596.2

Rituxan

AUEC(0-d15)

-2719.4
cells*day/µL) (Least Squares Mean)
95% Confidence Interval: -2855.3 to 2583.6

AUEC(0-w24)

-33003.7
cells*day/µL) (Least Squares Mean)
95% Confidence Interval: -33442.8 to -32564.6

Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Change From Baseline in CD19+ B-cell Count During the Study Period

Pharmacodynamic endpoint: Descriptive statistics (mean [SD]) of the change from baseline in CD19+ B-cell count during the study period (Day 15 [AUEC(0-d15] and Week 24 [AUEC(0-w24])

SAIT101

AUEC(0-d15)

-2729.0
Cells*day/µL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1915.3

AUEC(0-w24)

-33500.0
Cells*day/µL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23881

MabThera

AUEC(0-d15)

-2935.0
Cells*day/µL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 2222.1

AUEC(0-w24)

-36410.0
Cells*day/µL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 22883

Rituxan

AUEC(0-d15)

-2367.0
Cells*day/µL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1978.1

AUEC(0-w24)

-28500.0
Cells*day/µL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20878

Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52

Pharmacodynamic endpoint: Change from baseline (Day 1) in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (mg/dL) at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)

SAIT101

CRP Day 1

19.5
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 29.50

CRP Week 16

8.5
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.78

CRP Week 24

9.5
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.54

CRP Week 36

8.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.33

CRP Week 52 (EOS)

9.8
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.28

CRP Week 8

12.5
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.78

MabThera

CRP Day 1

15.5
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.76

CRP Week 16

7.2
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.02

CRP Week 24

8.3
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.40

CRP Week 36

7.0
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.38

CRP Week 52 (EOS)

9.1
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.01

CRP Week 8

12.3
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.29

Rituxan

CRP Day 1

16.1
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 17.64

CRP Week 16

7.3
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.90

CRP Week 24

7.9
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.35

CRP Week 36

7.1
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.72

CRP Week 52 (EOS)

7.3
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.33

CRP Week 8

10.4
Mg/dL (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.85

Total

294
Participants

Age, Continuous

51.8
years (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.79

Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status Positive

7
Participants

Body Mass Index (BMI)

27.2
Kg/m^2 (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.63

C-reactive protein

17.0
mg/L (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 2.99

Disease activity score based on a 28-joint count-C-Reactive Protein (DAS-28-CRP(

5.25
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.843

Disease activity score based on a 28-joint count - Erythrocyte sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR)

6.52
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.793

Disease duration

10.1
years (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 7.22

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

50.0
mm/hr (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 24.31

Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

1.7
Score (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.62

Height

162.4
cm (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 8.83

Patient Global Assessments Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

69.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 16.82

Patient Pain Assessment VAS Score

68.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 19.27

Physician Global Assessment VAS Score

70.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.51

Swollen Joint Count (SJC66)

14.5
Joints (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 7.14

Tender Joint Count (TJC68)

21.4
Joints (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.93

Weight

72.2
kg (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 17.47

Age, Customized

Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)

Race (NIH/OMB)

Region of Enrollment

Sex: Female, Male

Part A (All Participants)

SAIT101 (Part A and B)

MabThera (Part A and B)

Rituxan (Part A and B)

Part B (All Participants)

SAIT101 (Part A and B)

MabThera (Part A and B)

Rituxan (Part A and B)

SAIT101 (Part B Only)

Drop/Withdrawal Reasons

SAIT101 (Part A and B)

MabThera (Part A and B)

Rituxan (Part A and B)

SAIT101 (Part B Only)