Official Title

The CALIBER Study Randomized Controlled Trial of LINX Versus Double-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Reflux Disease
  • Phase

    Phase 4
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Intervention/Treatment

    omeprazole ...
  • Study Participants

    152
This study compares mechanical sphincter augmentation (LINX Reflux Management System) to double-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the management of reflux symptoms related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Prospective, multicenter, 2:1 randomized, cross-over, two arms

Control arm: Double-dose PPI [Omeprazole 20 mg BID (twice a day)]
Treatment arm: LINX Reflux Management System Up to 20 study centers throughout the U.S. will participate. Approximately150 patients will be enrolled into the study. Subjects will be randomized 2:1 into the double-dose PPIs arm (100 subjects) and the LINX arm (50 subjects).
Study Started
Jun 30
2015
Primary Completion
Oct 31
2017
Study Completion
Aug 31
2018
Results Posted
Dec 12
2018
Last Update
Jan 07
2019

Drug Omeprazole

  • Other names: Prilosec

Device LINX Reflux Management System

Control Arm Active Comparator

Double-dose PPI [Omeprazole 20 mg BID (twice a day)]

Treatment Arm Active Comparator

LINX Reflux Management System

Criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

Patient seeks consultation for lack of satisfactory symptom response to once daily PPIs.
Age≥ 21 years old.
Abnormal distal esophageal pH determined by total % time pH <4 or DeMeester Score. Testing to be completed off GERD medications for at least 7 days, with the exception of antacids, which may be taken up until the morning of assessment.
Suitable surgical candidate (i.e. is able to undergo general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery).
Patient has provided written informed consent for participation in the randomized study.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

Currently taking double-dose PPIs (twice daily dosing).
Hiatal hernia >3cm as determined by endoscopy.
Distal esophageal motility (average of sensors 3 and 4) is less than 35 mmHg peristaltic amplitude on wet swallows or <70% (propulsive) peristaltic sequences.
Esophagitis Grade C or D (Los Angeles classification).
Body mass index >35.
Diagnosed with an esophageal motility disorder LES.
Esophageal stricture or gross esophageal anatomic abnormalities
History of/or known Barrett's esophagus.
Suspected or known allergies to titanium, stainless steel, nickel or ferrous materials.

Summary

Control Arm

Treatment Arm

All Events

Event Type Organ System Event Term Control Arm Treatment Arm

Elimination of Moderate-severe Regurgitation at 6 Months

The primary endpoint was the percent of patients in both treatment arms who achieved elimination of moderate-severe regurgitation at 6 months, as reported on the foregut symptom questionnaire.

Control Arm

Treatment Arm

Percentage of Subjects With ≥50% Reduction in Total Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Scores

Successful Reduction at 6 months (≥50% reduction in total) Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) scores from Baseline PPI On medication GERD HRQL scores.

Control Arm

Treatment Arm

Total

152
Participants

Age, Continuous

46.9
years (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 13.4

Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)

Race (NIH/OMB)

Region of Enrollment

Sex: Female, Male

Overall Study

Control Arm

Treatment Arm

Drop/Withdrawal Reasons

Control Arm

Treatment Arm