Title

Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of KTE-C19 in Adult Participants With Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
A Phase 1/2 Multicenter Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of KTE-C19 in Adults With Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Phase

    Phase 1/Phase 2
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Study Participants

    307
This study will be separated into 3 distinct phases designated as the Phase 1 study, Phase 2 pivotal study (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), and Phase 2 safety management study (Cohort 3 and Cohort 4, Cohort 5 and Cohort 6).

The primary objectives of this study are:

Phase 1 Study: Evaluate the safety of axicabtagene ciloleucel regimens
Phase 2 Pivotal Study; Evaluate the efficacy of axicabtagene ciloleucel
Phase 2 Safety Management Study: Assess the impact of prophylactic regimens or earlier interventions on the rate and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicities

Subjects who received an infusion of KTE-C19 will complete the remainder of the 15 year follow-up assessments in a separate long-term follow-up study, KT-US-982-5968.
Study Started
Apr 21
2015
Primary Completion
Sep 10
2020
Study Completion
Jul 27
2023
Results Posted
Nov 23
2021
Last Update
Sep 06
2023

Biological Axicabtagene Ciloleucel

A single infusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-transduced autologous T cells administered intravenously at a target dose of 2 x 10^6 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg.

  • Other names: Yescarta®

Drug Fludarabine

Administered according to package insert

Drug Cyclophosphamide

Administered according to package insert

Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Experimental

A conditioning chemotherapy regimen of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide will be administered followed by investigational treatment, axicabtagene ciloleucel.

Criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

Histologically confirmed:

Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Primary Mediastinal Large B Cell Lymphoma (PMBCL)
Transformation Follicular Lymphoma (TFL)
High grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL)

Chemotherapy-refractory disease, defined as one of more of the following:

No response to last line of therapy i. Progressive disease (PD) as best response to most recent therapy regimen ii. Stable disease (SD) as best response to most recent therapy with duration no longer than 6 month from last dose of therapy OR
Refractory post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) i. Disease progression or relapsed less than or equal to 12 months of ASCT (must have biopsy proven recurrence in relapsed individuals) ii. If salvage therapy is given post-ASCT, the individual must have had no response to or relapsed after the last line of therapy

Individuals must have received adequate prior therapy including at a minimum:

anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody unless investigator determines that tumor is CD20-negative and
an anthracycline containing chemotherapy regimen
for individual with transformed FL must have chemorefractory disease after transformation to DLBCL.
At least one measurable lesion per revised IWG Response Criteria
Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1000/uL
Absolute lymphocyte count ≥ 100/uL
Platelet count ≥ 75,000/uL

Adequate renal, hepatic, pulmonary and cardiac function defined as:

Creatinine clearance (as estimated by Cockcroft Gault) > 60 mL/min
Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 2.5 upper limit of normal (ULN)
Total bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL, except in individuals with Gilbert's syndrome
Cardiac ejection fraction >50%, no evidence of pericardial effusion as determined by an echocardiogram (ECHO), and no clinically significant pleural effusion
Baseline oxygen saturation >92% on room air
All individuals or legally appointed representatives/caregivers, must personally sign and date the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved consent form before initiating any study specific procedures or activities.
Relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma including DLBCL, PMBCL, TFL, and HGBCL after two systemic lines of therapy

Key Exclusion Criteria

History of malignancy other than nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ (e.g. cervix, bladder, breast) or follicular lymphoma unless disease free for at least 3 years
History of allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Prior CAR therapy or other genetically modified T cell therapy
Presence of fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection that is uncontrolled or requiring IV antimicrobials for management. Simple urinary tract infection (UTI) and uncomplicated bacterial pharyngitis are permitted if responding to active treatment
History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or acute or chronic active hepatitis B or C infection. Individuals with history of hepatitis infection must have cleared their infection as determined by standard serological and genetic testing per current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines
Individuals with detectable cerebrospinal fluid malignant cells, or brain metastases, or with a history of central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma or primary CNS lymphoma, cerebrospinal fluid malignant cells or brain metastases
History or presence of CNS disorder such as seizure disorder, cerebrovascular ischemia/hemorrhage, dementia, cerebellar disease, or any autoimmune disease with CNS involvement

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Summary

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 1

Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 1

Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 2

Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 3

Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 4

Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 5

Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 6

All Events

Event Type Organ System Event Term Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1 Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2 Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3 Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4 Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5 Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6 Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 1 Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 1 Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 2 Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 3 Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 4 Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 5 Retreatment Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Phase 2 Cohort 6

Phase 1 Study: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) Defined as Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLT was defined as axicabtagene ciloleucel-related events with onset within first 30 days following infusion: Grade (GR) 4 neutropenia lasting > 21 days and GR 4 thrombocytopenia lasting > 35 days from day of cell transfer; Any axicabtagene ciloleucel-related AE requiring intubation; All other GR 3 toxicities lasting > 3 days and all GR 4 toxicities, with exception of following conditions which were not considered DLTs: aphasia/dysphasia or confusion/cognitive disturbance which resolved to GR ≤ 1 within 2 weeks and to baseline within 4 weeks; fever GR 3; myelosuppression defined as lymphopenia, decreased hemoglobin, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia unless neutropenia and thrombocytopenia met DLT definition described above; immediate hypersensitivity reactions occurring within 2 hours of cell infusion that were reversible to a ≤ GR 2 within 24 hours of cell administration with standard therapy; hypogammaglobulinemia GR 3 or 4.

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

Phase 2 Pivotal Study (Cohorts 1 and 2): Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Revised International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), as assessed by the study investigators using revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; all lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size; spleen and/or liver must be normal size, not be palpable, and no nodules; bone marrow aspirate and biopsy must show no evidence of disease. PR: a ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease; multiple splenic and hepatic nodules (if present) must regress by ≥ 50% in the SPD; > 50% decrease in the greatest transverse diameter for single nodules. 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by Clopper-Pearson method.

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

82.0
percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval: 71.0 to 90.0

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

83.0
percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval: 63.0 to 95.0

Phase 2 Safety Management Study (Cohort 3): Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Neurologic Toxicities by Severity Grades

TEAE was defined as any AE with onset on or after the start of treatment. CRS events were graded by Lee et al 2014. Grade 1 : No life threatening symptoms and require symptomatic treatment only; Grade 2: Symptoms require and respond to moderate intervention; Grade 3: Symptoms require and respond to aggressive intervention; Grade 4: Life-threatening symptoms and requirements for ventilator support or continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), and Grade 5: Death. Neurologic toxicities were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1: Mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms and intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate and minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: Life-threatening and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death related to AE.

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Worst Grade 1 CRS

34.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 1 Neurologic Toxicities

24.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 2 CRS

55.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 2 Neurologic Toxicities

24.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade ≥ 3 CRS

3.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 3 CRS

Worst Grade ≥ 3 Neurologic Toxicities

39.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 3 Neurologic Toxicities

34.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 4 CRS

3.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 4 Neurologic Toxicities

3.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 5 CRS

Worst Grade 5 Neurologic Toxicities

3.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 Safety Management Study (Cohort 4): Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent CRS and Neurologic Toxicities by Severity Grades

TEAE was defined as any AE with onset on or after the start of treatment. CRS events were graded by Lee et al 2014. Grade 1 : No life threatening symptoms and require symptomatic treatment only; Grade 2: Symptoms require and respond to moderate intervention; Grade 3: Symptoms require and respond to aggressive intervention; Grade 4: Life-threatening symptoms and requirements for ventilator support or CVVHD, and Grade 5: Death. Neurologic toxicities were graded by CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 1: Mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms and intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate and minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: Life-threatening and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death related to AE.

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Worst Grade 1 CRS

32.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 1 Neurologic Toxicities

34.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 2 CRS

59.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 2 Neurologic Toxicities

10.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade ≥ 3 CRS

2.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 3 CRS

2.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade ≥ 3 Neurologic Toxicities

17.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 3 Neurologic Toxicities

17.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 4 CRS

Worst Grade 4 Neurologic Toxicities

Worst Grade 5 CRS

Worst Grade 5 Neurologic Toxicities

Phase 2 Safety Management Study (Cohort 5): Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent CRS and Neurologic Toxicities by Severity Grades

TEAE was defined as any AE with onset on or after the start of treatment. CRS events were graded by Lee et al 2014. Grade 1 : No life threatening symptoms and require symptomatic treatment only; Grade 2: Symptoms require and respond to moderate intervention; Grade 3: Symptoms require and respond to aggressive intervention; Grade 4: Life-threatening symptoms and requirements for ventilator support or CVVHD, and Grade 5: Death. Neurologic toxicities were graded by CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 1: Mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms and intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate and minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: Life-threatening and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death related to AE.

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Worst Grade 1 CRS

38.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 1 Neurologic Toxicities

26.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 2 CRS

46.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 2 Neurologic Toxicities

18.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade ≥ 3 CRS

2.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 3 CRS

Worst Grade ≥ 3 Neurologic Toxicities

12.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 3 Neurologic Toxicities

10.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 4 CRS

2.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 4 Neurologic Toxicities

2.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 5 CRS

Worst Grade 5 Neurologic Toxicities

Phase 2 Safety Management Study (Cohort 6): Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent CRS and Neurologic Toxicities by Severity Grades

TEAE was defined as any AE with onset on or after the start of treatment. CRS events were graded by Lee et al 2014. Grade 1 : No life threatening symptoms and require symptomatic treatment only; Grade 2: Symptoms require and respond to moderate intervention; Grade 3: Symptoms require and respond to aggressive intervention; Grade 4: Life-threatening symptoms and requirements for ventilator support or CVVHD, and Grade 5: Death. Neurologic toxicities were graded by CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 1: Mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms and intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate and minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: Life-threatening and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death related to AE.

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Worst Grade 1 CRS

35.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 1 Neurologic Toxicities

25.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 2 CRS

45.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 2 Neurologic Toxicities

18.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade ≥ 3 CRS

Worst Grade 3 CRS

Worst Grade ≥ 3 Neurologic Toxicities

15.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 3 Neurologic Toxicities

8.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 4 CRS

Worst Grade 4 Neurologic Toxicities

5.0
percentage of participants

Worst Grade 5 CRS

Worst Grade 5 Neurologic Toxicities

3.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

Among participants who experience an objective response (OR), DOR was defined as the date of their first objective response (CR or PR which was subsequently confirmed) to disease progression per the revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma or death regardless of cause. CR and PR as defined in outcome measure 2. Disease progression (PD) was defined by at least one of the following: ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the sum of the products of at least 2 lymph nodes, or at least a 50% increase in the product of the diameters of a single lymph node; appearance of a new lesion > 1.5 cm in any axis; ≥ 50% increase in size of splenic or hepatic nodules; ≥ 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node > 1 cm in its short axis. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates was used for analyses.

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

4.2
months (Median)
95% Confidence Interval: 2.1

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Phase 1 Study: ORR as Assessed by Investigator Per Revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving either a CR or a PR, as assessed by the study investigators using revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; all lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size; spleen and/or liver must be normal size, not be palpable, and no nodules; bone marrow aspirate and biopsy must show no evidence of disease. PR: a ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease; multiple splenic and hepatic nodules (if present) must regress by ≥ 50% in the SPD; > 50% decrease in the greatest transverse diameter for single nodules.

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

71.0
percentage of participants

Pharmacodynamics: Peak Level of Cytokines (Ferritin, ICAM-1, IL-2 R, Perforin, and VCAM-1) in Serum (Phase 2 Cohorts 4, 5, and 6)

Peak was defined as the maximum post-baseline level of the cytokine. Following key cytokines were measured: Ferritin, ICAM-1, IL-2 R, Perforin, and VCAM-1.

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Ferritin

1086.36
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 95.55 to 23900.0

ICAM-1

907.97
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 359.51 to 5141.64

IL-2 R

10.78
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2.81 to 94.59

Perforin

17.22
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 3.88 to 44.42

VCAM-1

1255.32
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 594.51 to 3932.61

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Ferritin

1516.11
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 89.29 to 31600.0

ICAM-1

636.74
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 361.38 to 4835.93

IL-2 R

7.82
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.36 to 83.6

Perforin

10.85
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2.53 to 100.0

VCAM-1

854.63
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 476.6 to 6501.14

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Ferritin

903.5
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 171.61 to 6555.1

ICAM-1

654.81
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 355.15 to 4419.09

IL-2 R

6.43
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.7 to 33.31

Perforin

10.12
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.97 to 39.62

VCAM-1

836.04
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 411.93 to 5079.25

Pharmacodynamics: Peak Level of Cytokine (CRP) in Serum

Peak was defined as the maximum post-baseline level of the cytokine.

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

112.6
mg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 14.6 to 655.0

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

215.7
mg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 31.0 to 496.0

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

186.6
mg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 18.5 to 496.0

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

137.8
mg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2.1 to 496.0

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

126.53
mg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 18.19 to 496.0

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

74.84
mg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.81 to 496.0

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

76.11
mg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 7.31 to 496.0

Phase 2 Pivotal Study (Cohorts 1 and 2): ORR Per Independent Radiological Review Committee (IRRC)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving either a CR or a PR, as assessed by the IRRC using revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; all lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size; spleen and/or liver must be normal size, not be palpable, and no nodules; bone marrow aspirate and biopsy must show no evidence of disease. PR: a ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease; multiple splenic and hepatic nodules (if present) must regress by ≥ 50% in the SPD; > 50% decrease in the greatest transverse diameter for single nodules. 95% CI was calculated by Clopper-Pearson method.

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

69.0
percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval: 57.0 to 79.0

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

79.0
percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval: 58.0 to 93.0

Phase 2 Safety Management Study (Cohorts 3, 4, 5, and 6): ORR as Assessed by Investigator Per the Revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving either a CR or a PR, as assessed by the study investigators using revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; all lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size; spleen and/or liver must be normal size, not be palpable, and no nodules; bone marrow aspirate and biopsy must show no evidence of disease. PR: a ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease; multiple splenic and hepatic nodules (if present) must regress by ≥ 50% in the SPD; > 50% decrease in the greatest transverse diameter for single nodules. 95% CI was calculated by Clopper-Pearson method.

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

63.0
percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval: 46.0 to 78.0

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

73.0
percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval: 57.0 to 86.0

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

72.0
percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval: 58.0 to 84.0

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

95.0
percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval: 83.0 to 99.0

Phase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigator Per Revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

PFS was defined as the time from the axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion date to the date of disease progression per the revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al, 2007) or death from any cause. Participants not meeting the criteria for progression by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date. Disease progression was defined by at least one of the following: ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the sum of the products of at least 2 lymph nodes, or at least a 50% increase in the product of the diameters of a single lymph node; appearance of a new lesion > 1.5 cm in any axis; ≥ 50% increase in size of splenic or hepatic nodules; ≥ 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node > 1 cm in its short axis. KM estimates was used for analyses.

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

5.1
months (Median)
95% Confidence Interval: 3.0 to 7.3

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

6.2
months (Median)
95% Confidence Interval: 2.4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

3.1
months (Median)
95% Confidence Interval: 2.9

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion to the date of death. Participants who did not die by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last contact date. KM estimates was used for analyses.

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

11.5
months (Median)
95% Confidence Interval: 8.6

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

15.4
months (Median)
95% Confidence Interval: 5.4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

14.6
months (Median)
95% Confidence Interval: 12.5

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Pharmacodynamics: Peak Level of Cytokine (Ferritin) in Serum (Phase 1 and Phase 2 Cohorts 1 and 2)

Peak was defined as the maximum post-baseline level of the cytokine.

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

1973400.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1201900.0 to 32984400.0

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

3681400.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 780.0 to 25000000.0

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

1979360.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 780.0 to 25000000.0

Pharmacodynamics: Peak Level of Cytokine (Ferritin) in Serum (Phase 2 Cohort 3)

Peak was defined as the maximum post-baseline level of the cytokine.

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

2440.2
ng/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.8 to 25000.0

Phase 2 Pivotal Study (Cohorts 1 and 2): Duration of Response (DOR) Using IRRC Per Cheson 2007

Among participants who experience an objective response, DOR was defined as the date of their first objective response (CR or PR which was subsequently confirmed) to PD per the revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma or death regardless of cause. CR and PR as defined in outcome measure 2. PD was defined by at least one of the following: ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the sum of the products of at least 2 lymph nodes, or at least a 50% increase in the product of the diameters of a single lymph node; appearance of a new lesion > 1.5 cm in any axis; ≥ 50% increase in size of splenic or hepatic nodules; ≥ 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node > 1 cm in its short axis. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates was used for analyses.

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

5.4
months (Median)
95% Confidence Interval: 2.5 to 8.1

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Phase 2 Pivotal Study (Cohorts 1 and 2): Best Overall Response Using IRRC Per Cheson 2007

The best overall response for each participant was based on the assessments of response (CR, PR, stable disease [SD], PD, and not done [ND]) made by the the IRRC using IWG 2007 criteria (Cheson et al, 2007). CR and PR as defined in outcome measure 2. PD defined by at least one of the following: ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the sum of the products of at least 2 lymph nodes, or at least a 50% increase in the product of the diameters of a single lymph node; appearance of a new lesion > 1.5 cm in any axis; ≥ 50% increase in size of splenic or hepatic nodules; ≥ 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node > 1 cm in its short axis. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Percentage of participants with best overall response of CR, PR, SD, PD, and ND was reported.

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

CR

49.0
percentage of participants

ND

3.0
percentage of participants

PD

8.0
percentage of participants

PR

19.0
percentage of participants

SD

21.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

CR

58.0
percentage of participants

ND

13.0
percentage of participants

PD

4.0
percentage of participants

PR

21.0
percentage of participants

SD

4.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 Pivotal Study (Cohorts 1 and 2): PFS Using IRRC Per Cheson 2007

PFS was defined as the time from the axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion date to the date of disease progression per the revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al, 2007) or death from any cause. Participants not meeting the criteria for progression by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date. PD defined by at least one of the following: ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the sum of the products of at least 2 lymph nodes, or at least a 50% increase in the product of the diameters of a single lymph node; appearance of a new lesion > 1.5 cm in any axis; ≥ 50% increase in size of splenic or hepatic nodules; ≥ 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node > 1 cm in its short axis. KM estimates was used for analyses.

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

5.0
months (Median)
95% Confidence Interval: 3.0 to 7.0

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participants. The event did not necessarily have a relationship with study treatment. Adverse events included worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. Worsening indicated that the pre-existing medical condition had increased in severity, frequency, and/or duration or had an association with a worse outcome. A pre-existing condition that had not worsened during the study or involved an intervention such as elective cosmetic surgery or a medical procedure while on study, was not considered an adverse event. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset on or after the start of treatment.

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

100.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

100.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

100.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

100.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

100.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

100.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

100.0
percentage of participants

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Toxicity Grade Shifts to Grade 4 and Grade 3 or Higher Resulting From Increased Parameter Value

Grading categories were determined by CTCAE version 4.03. Shifts to Grade 3 or higher has been reported for Phase 2 Cohort 3. For Phase 1 and all other cohorts of Phase 2, shifts to Grade 4 has been reported.

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

Lymphocytes

Magnesium

Neutrophils

Phosphate

Platelets

Potassium

Sodium

Urate

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

Creatinine

3.0
percentage of participants

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

Lymphocytes

Magnesium

5.0
percentage of participants

Neutrophils

Phosphate

Platelets

Potassium

Sodium

Urate

3.0
percentage of participants

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

Alanine Aminotransferase

14.0
percentage of participants

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

Lymphocytes

Magnesium

Neutrophils

Phosphate

Platelets

Potassium

Sodium

Urate

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

Alanine Aminotransferase

1.0
percentage of participants

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

1.0
percentage of participants

Calcium

1.0
percentage of participants

Creatinine

1.0
percentage of participants

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

Lymphocytes

Magnesium

Neutrophils

Phosphate

Platelets

Potassium

Sodium

Urate

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

Creatinine

4.0
percentage of participants

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

Lymphocytes

Magnesium

Neutrophils

Phosphate

Platelets

Potassium

Sodium

Urate

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Alanine Aminotransferase

21.0
percentage of participants

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

5.0
percentage of participants

Aspartate Aminotransferase

16.0
percentage of participants

Bilirubin

5.0
percentage of participants

Calcium

3.0
percentage of participants

Creatinine

5.0
percentage of participants

Direct Bilirubin

18.0
percentage of participants

Glucose

8.0
percentage of participants

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

Lymphocytes

Magnesium

8.0
percentage of participants

Neutrophils

Phosphate

Platelets

Potassium

3.0
percentage of participants

Sodium

Urate

13.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

2.0
percentage of participants

Bilirubin

Calcium

2.0
percentage of participants

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

2.0
percentage of participants

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

Lymphocytes

Magnesium

Neutrophils

Phosphate

Platelets

Potassium

2.0
percentage of participants

Sodium

Urate

2.0
percentage of participants

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Toxicity Grade Shifts to Grade 4 and Grade 3 or Higher Resulting From Decreased Parameter Value

Grading categories were determined by CTCAE version 4.03. Shifts to Grade 3 or higher has been reported for Phase 2 Cohort 3. For Phase 1 and all other cohorts of Phase 2, shifts to Grade 4 has been reported.

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

100.0
percentage of participants

Lymphocytes

100.0
percentage of participants

Magnesium

Neutrophils

100.0
percentage of participants

Phosphate

Platelets

57.0
percentage of participants

Potassium

Sodium

Urate

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

4.0
percentage of participants

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

84.0
percentage of participants

Lymphocytes

100.0
percentage of participants

Magnesium

Neutrophils

82.0
percentage of participants

Phosphate

Platelets

35.0
percentage of participants

Potassium

Sodium

Urate

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

13.0
percentage of participants

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

75.0
percentage of participants

Lymphocytes

100.0
percentage of participants

Magnesium

Neutrophils

79.0
percentage of participants

Phosphate

Platelets

17.0
percentage of participants

Potassium

Sodium

Urate

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

13.0
percentage of participants

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

24.0
percentage of participants

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

3.0
percentage of participants

Hemoglobin

47.0
percentage of participants

Leukocytes

97.0
percentage of participants

Lymphocytes

100.0
percentage of participants

Magnesium

Neutrophils

97.0
percentage of participants

Phosphate

42.0
percentage of participants

Platelets

68.0
percentage of participants

Potassium

13.0
percentage of participants

Sodium

16.0
percentage of participants

Urate

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

7.0
percentage of participants

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

93.0
percentage of participants

Lymphocytes

71.0
percentage of participants

Magnesium

Neutrophils

90.0
percentage of participants

Phosphate

2.0
percentage of participants

Platelets

17.0
percentage of participants

Potassium

2.0
percentage of participants

Sodium

Urate

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

2.0
percentage of participants

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

88.0
percentage of participants

Lymphocytes

46.0
percentage of participants

Magnesium

Neutrophils

86.0
percentage of participants

Phosphate

4.0
percentage of participants

Platelets

38.0
percentage of participants

Potassium

2.0
percentage of participants

Sodium

2.0
percentage of participants

Urate

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Alanine Aminotransferase

Albumin

Alkaline Phosphatase

Aspartate Aminotransferase

Bilirubin

Calcium

3.0
percentage of participants

Creatinine

Direct Bilirubin

Glucose

Hemoglobin

Leukocytes

85.0
percentage of participants

Lymphocytes

95.0
percentage of participants

Magnesium

Neutrophils

78.0
percentage of participants

Phosphate

Platelets

23.0
percentage of participants

Potassium

Sodium

Urate

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Antibodies

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

4.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

5.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

8.0
percentage of participants

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

8.0
percentage of participants

Pharmacokinetics: Peak Level of Anti-CD19 CAR T Cells in Blood

Peak was defined as the maximum number of CAR T cells measured post-infusion.

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

58.512
cells/µL (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 18.028 to 147.732

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

31.512
cells/µL (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 12.445 to 74.746

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

58.633
cells/µL (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 27.884 to 103.19

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

53.67
cells/µL (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 22.813 to 146.075

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

52.91
cells/µL (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 27.25 to 92.78

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

26.63
cells/µL (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 12.52 to 117.53

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

64.38
cells/µL (Median)
Inter-Quartile Range: 6.27 to 131.24

Pharmacodynamics: Peak Level of Cytokines in Serum (Phase 1 and Phase 2 Cohorts 1, 2, and 3)

Peak was defined as the maximum post-baseline level of the cytokine. Following key cytokines were measured: interferon-gamma induced protein 10 (IP-10), ferritin, granzyme B, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), IL-2, interleukin-2 receptor alpha (IL-2 R alpha), IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, perforin, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), and vascular cell adhesion molecule- 1 (VCAM-1).

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

Granzyme B

33.1
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.6 to 463.8

ICAM-1

792754.3
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 537796.8 to 2424877.7

IFN-gamma

792.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 81.1 to 1876.0

IL-10

52.5
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 3.8 to 614.0

IL-15

57.1
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 18.7 to 271.3

IL-1 RA

2173.3
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 544.3 to 4000.0

IL-2

18.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 3.1 to 91.0

IL-2 R alpha

16872.7
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2189.0 to 34044.5

IL-6

305.3
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2.4 to 976.0

IL-7

51.5
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 31.2 to 71.5

IL-8

86.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 17.1 to 750.0

IP-10

2000.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 147.0 to 2000.0

Perforin

5389.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2582.7 to 20724.3

TNF alpha

10.5
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.8 to 443.1

VCAM-1

1387033.6
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 609223.2 to 8424222.9

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

Granzyme B

31.1
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.0 to 3306.0

ICAM-1

1322829.3
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 557025.0 to 7495123.2

IFN-gamma

493.8
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 32.4 to 1876.0

IL-10

43.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.7 to 466.0

IL-15

56.5
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 13.1 to 226.6

IL-1 RA

2371.2
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 510.8 to 4000.0

IL-2

25.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.9 to 123.1

IL-2 R alpha

14383.7
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 78.0 to 100000.0

IL-6

89.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 3.5 to 976.0

IL-7

38.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 13.8 to 153.5

IL-8

118.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 14.2 to 750.0

IP-10

2000.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 628.1 to 2000.0

Perforin

11309.5
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2282.3 to 39818.9

TNF alpha

8.6
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2.6 to 166.9

VCAM-1

1478356.8
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 642372.6 to 3859375.8

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Granzyme B

17.3
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.0 to 406.8

ICAM-1

989188.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 544589.3 to 4588974.8

IFN-gamma

364.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 7.5 to 1876.0

IL-10

18.8
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.7 to 263.6

IL-15

47.6
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 11.3 to 195.2

IL-1 RA

1999.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 649.9 to 4000.0

IL-2

13.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.9 to 63.7

IL-2 R alpha

7817.3
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 78.0 to 66024.6

IL-6

44.6
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 3.6 to 976.0

IL-7

44.1
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 27.9 to 98.8

IL-8

77.2
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 9.8 to 750.0

IP-10

2000.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 434.2 to 2000.0

Perforin

8278.7
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2332.6 to 31857.7

TNF alpha

6.8
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2.2 to 44.9

VCAM-1

1058453.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 634769.7 to 2864040.2

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Granzyme B

44.1
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.0 to 534.6

ICAM-1

1009966.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 256768.6 to 4879749.7

IFN-gamma

1857.2
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 65.0 to 1876.0

IL-10

48.2
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.8 to 466.0

IL-15

50.3
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 21.9 to 537.3

IL-1 RA

2160.5
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 653.7 to 4000.0

IL-2

20.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.9 to 189.4

IL-2 R alpha

12386.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 3002.6 to 100000.0

IL-6

921.8
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 13.3 to 976.0

IL-7

38.8
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 19.1 to 83.8

IL-8

120.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 10.3 to 750.0

IP-10

2000.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 541.0 to 2000.0

Perforin

15411.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 4327.4 to 30575.9

TNF alpha

10.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 3.3 to 52.1

VCAM-1

1367940.7
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 721050.0 to 5184238.4

Pharmacodynamics: Peak Level of Cytokines (IP-10, Granzyme B, IFN-gamma, IL-1 RA, IL-10, IL-15, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, TNF Alpha, and GM-CSF) in Serum (Phase 2 Cohorts 4, 5, and 6)

Peak was defined as the maximum post-baseline level of the cytokine. Following key cytokines were measured: IP-10, granzyme B, IFN-gamma, IL-1 RA, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, TNF alpha, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

GM-CSF

4.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.9 to 47.0

Granzyme B

23.1
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.0 to 322.6

IFN-gamma

334.5
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 24.9 to 1876.0

IL-10

19.6
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.4 to 466.0

IL-15

45.8
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 22.3 to 272.7

IL-1 RA

1093.7
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 193.3 to 4493.1

IL-2

11.2
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.9 to 79.4

IL-6

136.7
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.6 to 976.0

IL-7

33.1
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 18.0 to 67.5

IL-8

67.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 8.5 to 750.0

IP-10

1549.7
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 469.2 to 2000.0

TNF alpha

5.7
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2.0 to 54.6

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

GM-CSF

2.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.9 to 35.6

Granzyme B

27.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.0 to 375.76

IFN-gamma

314.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 7.5 to 1876.0

IL-10

14.45
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.7 to 300.9

IL-15

34.15
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.4 to 140.0

IL-1 RA

908.0
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 229.0 to 9000.0

IL-2

11.85
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.9 to 142.7

IL-6

97.95
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.6 to 976.0

IL-7

29.8
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.4 to 65.2

IL-8

75.1
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 5.8 to 750.0

IP-10

1746.15
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 349.8 to 2000.0

TNF alpha

5.25
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.4 to 33.3

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

GM-CSF

1.9
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.9 to 47.4

Granzyme B

18.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.0 to 162.3

IFN-gamma

207.95
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 18.8 to 1876.0

IL-10

13.3
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.7 to 171.2

IL-15

37.2
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 9.5 to 86.3

IL-1 RA

1279.5
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 227.0 to 9000.0

IL-2

8.4
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 0.9 to 277.6

IL-6

47.25
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 1.6 to 976.0

IL-7

28.25
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 13.2 to 74.3

IL-8

52.55
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 10.0 to 750.0

IP-10

1560.03
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 347.0 to 2000.0

TNF alpha

4.8
pg/mL (Median)
Full Range: 2.1 to 20.2

Percentage of Participants With Positive Replication Competent Retrovirus (RCR)

RCR was analyzed in blood samples by central laboratory. Because axicabtagene ciloleucel comprised retroviral vector transduced T cells, the presence of RCR in the blood of treated participants was reported.

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Phase 2 Safety Management Study: Number of Participants With the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale (EQ-5D) Score

EQ-5D is a self-reported questionnaire used for assessing the overall health status of a participant scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension was divided into 5 levels of severity: "No problem", "Slight problems", "Moderate problems", "Severe problems", and "Extreme problems (unable to perform)". EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state).

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Baseline: Anxiety/Depression

Baseline: Mobility

Baseline: Pain/Discomfort

Baseline: Self-care

Baseline: Usual activities

Month 3: Anxiety/Depression

Month 3: Mobility

Month 3: Pain/Discomfort

Month 3: Self-care

Month 3: Usual activities

Month 6: Anxiety/Depression

Month 6: Mobility

Month 6: Pain/Discomfort

Month 6: Self-care

Month 6: Usual activities

Week 4: Anxiety/Depression

Week 4: Mobility

Week 4: Pain/Discomfort

Week 4: Self-care

Week 4: Usual activities

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Baseline: Anxiety/Depression

Baseline: Mobility

Baseline: Pain/Discomfort

Baseline: Self-care

Baseline: Usual activities

Month 3: Anxiety/Depression

Month 3: Mobility

Month 3: Pain/Discomfort

Month 3: Self-care

Month 3: Usual activities

Month 6: Anxiety/Depression

Month 6: Mobility

Month 6: Pain/Discomfort

Month 6: Self-care

Month 6: Usual activities

Week 4: Anxiety/Depression

Week 4: Mobility

Week 4: Pain/Discomfort

Week 4: Self-care

Week 4: Usual activities

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Baseline: Anxiety/Depression

Baseline: Mobility

Baseline: Pain/Discomfort

Baseline: Self-care

Baseline: Usual activities

Month 3: Anxiety/Depression

Month 3: Mobility

Month 3: Pain/Discomfort

Month 3: Self-care

Month 3: Usual activities

Month 6: Anxiety/Depression

Month 6: Mobility

Month 6: Pain/Discomfort

Month 6: Self-care

Month 6: Usual activities

Week 4: Anxiety/Depression

Week 4: Mobility

Week 4: Pain/Discomfort

Week 4: Self-care

Week 4: Usual activities

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Baseline: Anxiety/Depression

Baseline: Mobility

Baseline: Pain/Discomfort

Baseline: Self-care

Baseline: Usual activities

Month 3: Anxiety/Depression

Month 3: Mobility

Month 3: Pain/Discomfort

Month 3: Self-care

Month 3: Usual activities

Month 6: Anxiety/Depression

Month 6: Mobility

Month 6: Pain/Discomfort

Month 6: Self-care

Month 6: Usual activities

Week 4: Anxiety/Depression

Week 4: Mobility

Week 4: Pain/Discomfort

Week 4: Self-care

Week 4: Usual activities

Phase 2 Safety Management Study: EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

EQ-5D is a self-reported questionnaire used for assessing the overall health status of a participant. The EQ-5D-VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale and is asked to make a global assessment of their current state of health with 0 indicating the worst health they can imagine and 100 indicating the best health they can imagine.

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Baseline

71.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 21.3

Month 3

74.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 16.6

Month 6

77.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 21.4

Week 4

67.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.6

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Baseline

69.5
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 18.8

Month 3

78.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.7

Month 6

85.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.1

Week 4

67.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.9

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Baseline

66.7
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.7

Month 3

73.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 19.9

Month 6

77.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.7

Week 4

70.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.8

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Baseline

70.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 17.0

Month 3

76.5
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.0

Month 6

79.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.0

Week 4

76.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 13.2

Total

277
Participants

Age, Customized

Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)

Race/Ethnicity, Customized

Region of Enrollment

Sex: Female, Male

Overall Study

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6

Drop/Withdrawal Reasons

Phase 1 Study: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Conditioning Chemotherapy

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 1

Phase 2 (Pivotal Study): Cohort 2

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 3

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 4

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 5

Phase 2 (Safety Management Study): Cohort 6