Title
Rituximab or Zevalin - Efficacy Trial of Therapeutic Alternatives (RoZetta)
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study in Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients to Evaluate the Efficacy of Consolidation With Zevalin® Versus Maintenance Treatment With Rituximab After Initial Therapeutic Response to Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy
Phase
Phase 3Lead Sponsor
Spectrum PharmaceuticalsStudy Type
InterventionalStatus
Terminated Results PostedIndication/Condition
Follicular LymphomaIntervention/Treatment
ibritumomab tiuxetan rituximab ...Study Participants
1The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of consolidation treatment Zevalin® versus maintenance treatment with Rituxan® on progression-free survival (PFS) following response induction with chemotherapy plus rituximab in previously untreated participants with follicular lymphoma.
This is an open-label, multicenter and randomized study. Participants registered after response induction (PR/CR) to R-chemotherapy. Participants achieving either a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) following R-chemotherapy eligible for randomization to either consolidation with 90Y-ibritumumab tiuxetan followed by observation for 24 months, or rituximab maintenance for 24 months. After the observation/maintenance period, patients follow up for 5 years.
This study was terminated early for business reasons. (Maximum duration of study was up to approximately 2.7 months).
Zevalin administered intravenously.
Rituximab administered intravenously.
90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan administered 8 to 12 weeks after the last chemotherapy infusion. Each participant randomized to this treatment group was to receive a therapeutic dose of 14.8 MBq/kg (0.4 mCi/kg of total body weight) of 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan (maximum 1,184 MBq or 32 mCi). Participants with a pre-treatment platelet count between 100 and 149 x10^9/L were to receive 0.3 mCi/Kg 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan. (Body weight ≤80 kg: 14.8 MBq [0.4 mCi] yttrium-90/kg and Body weight >80 kg: 1,184 MBq [32 mCi] maximum dose). The 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan regimen is as follows: Day 1 rituximab (250 mg/m^2); Day 7,8, or 9 rituximab (250 mg/m^2) followed by 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan within 4 hours of the end of the rituximab infusion. (Maximum duration of study was up to approximately 2.7 months).
Participants were to receive 375 mg/m^2 of rituximab, administered by intravenous (I.V.) infusion every 8 weeks, starting 8 to 12 weeks after the last R-chemotherapy cycle. (Maximum duration of study was up to approximately 2.7 months).
Inclusion Criteria: 18 to 75 years of age. Previously untreated with histologically confirmed grade 1, 2 or 3a cluster of differentiation-20 (CD20)-positive follicular lymphoma, with any of the GELF (Groupe d'Etude de Lymphomes Folliculaires) treatment criteria prior to induction. Achieved a response to induction treatment with either rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) (6 cycles of R-CHOP21 or R-CHOP14), rituximab-cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) (6 cycles), or rituximab-bendamustine (R-B) (4 to 6 cycles). Must have completed all doses of the induction treatment, except for the modifications allowed in the protocol. Exclusion Criteria: Transformation to high grade lymphoma (secondary to "low grade" follicular lymphoma [FL]). Grade 3b follicular lymphoma. Primary follicular lymphoma of the skin or gastrointestinal tract. Previous treatment of follicular lymphoma. Altered renal and hepatic function. Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and/or active hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection Serious co-morbid conditions (for example, ongoing infection, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, gastric ulcers, active autoimmune disease). Life expectancy < 6. Must have: Platelet count ≥ 100x10^9/L. Bone marrow infiltration <25%.
| Event Type | Organ System | Event Term |
|---|
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization until progression, relapse, death from any cause, or introduction of a new anti-lymphoma treatment (chemotherapy, radiation therapy or immunotherapy).
EFS time is defined as the time from randomization to first documented progression, death from any cause, or introduction of a new anti-lymphoma treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy).
TTP is defined as the time from randomization to the first disease progression.
TTNLT is defined as the time from randomization to the first introduction of any new anti lymphoma regimen.
TTNCT is defined as the time from randomization to the first introduction of any new chemotherapy (cytotoxic or radioimmunotherapy). The TTNCT may be the same as the TTNLT. Participants who respond to treatment and Participants who are lost to follow-up censored at the visit on which the dosing of a new medication was evaluated.
Tumor response evaluated according to Cheson criteria at the time of randomization and at the end of the maintenance/observation, post randomization. ORR is defined as the percentage of Participants with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), and compared between treatment groups. Participants with no response evaluation (for any reason) considered as not evaluable (NE).
OS is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. In living patients, survival time was censored on the last date participants were known to be alive.
Transformation rate at first progression, defined as the appearance of diffuse areas of large lymphoma cells within a tumor site.
Toxicity graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.
The FACT-G is a participant rated, 27-item compilation of general questions divided into 4 primary Quality of Life (QOL) sub-scales: physical well-being (PWB; 7-items, score range 0-28), social/family well-being (SWB; 7-items, score range 0-28), emotional well-being (EWB; 6-items, score range 0-24), and functional well-being (FWB; 7-items, score range 0-28). This tool represents the generic core questionnaire that are utilized in combination with cancer site-specific questionnaires, (FBrain, in this study) Overall score and four subscale scores with ranges and distributions that are sample-specific can be calculated.FACT-G is scored by summing the individual scale scores; higher scores indicate better quality of life. FACT-G uses 5-point rating scale ranging from (0) = Not at all; (1) = A little bit; (2) = Somewhat; (3) = Quite a bit; to (4) = Very much.The FACT-G total score is the sum of the four subscale scores (if least 80% completed) and has a possible range of 0-108 points.
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) & other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health & quality of life, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent).EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 & 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. High score represented a favourable outcome with a best quality of life for participant.
A cost-effectiveness analysis done that compares the efficiency (cost/effectiveness unit) of consolidation treatment with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan compared to maintenance treatment with rituximab. The analysis conducted according to a health economic analysis plan independent from this clinical study protocol.
