Title

Diagnostic Utility of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) by Brain Activity Flow Patterns Analysis Using Evoked Response Potentials
Diagnostic Utility of ADHD by Brain Activity Flow Patterns Analysis Using Evoked Response Potentials
  • Phase

    Phase 4
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Intervention/Treatment

    methylphenidate ...
  • Study Participants

    71
The purpose of this research study is to study a device called an electroencephalograph (EEG) in the diagnosis of treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. People with ADHD have symptoms such as difficulty sustaining attention, organizing, and managing impulsivity. They can have trouble in school, at work, and at home. Subjects with ADHD who participate in this study will be given a once daily stimulant medication called osmotic release methylphenidate (Concerta) for 6 weeks, and have EEG testing done before and after the treatment period. Subjects will perform a computer based cognitive task during EEG testing. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved osmotic release methylphenidate (Concerta) for the treatment of ADHD in adults and children. Similar procedures, without medication, will be performed with a sample of healthy adults without ADHD.
Study Started
Sep 30
2009
Primary Completion
Feb 29
2012
Study Completion
Feb 29
2012
Results Posted
Dec 09
2013
Estimate
Last Update
May 03
2017

Drug Osmotic Release Methylphenidate

During a 6 week treatment period, adult subjects with ADHD are prescribed, in an open label fashion, once daily doses of osmotic release methylphenidate to a maximum daily dose of 144 mg. Efficacy and tolerability assessments are completed, in addition to EEG and cognitive testing. Healthy adults without ADHD will not receive medication.

  • Other names: Concerta

Concerta Experimental

Open-Label Concerta (Osmotic Release Methylphenidate)

Control group No Intervention

Healthy subjects without ADHD will be assessed using EEG.

Criteria

ADHD Subjects

Inclusion Criteria:

Male and female outpatients, aged 18-55 years
Subjects meeting full criteria for the diagnosis of DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Version 4) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Absence of pharmacological treatment for ADHD for at least one week.
Right handedness

Exclusion Criteria:

Any other current psychiatric or medical condition determined to be clinically significant.
Current use of psychotropics or any medication with clinically significant CNS (Central Nervous System) effects.
Mental retardation (IQ < 80).
Significant sensory deficits such as deafness or blindness.
Individuals with a history of substance dependence or abuse within the past 6 months.
Pregnant or nursing females.
Subjects with pre-existing structural cardiac abnormalities.
Clinically significant abnormal laboratory values, electrocardiogram or blood pressure reading

Healthy Control Subjects

Inclusion Criteria:

Males and females, aged 18-55 years
Subjects who do not meet full criteria for the diagnosis of DSM-IV Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), as determined by clinical evaluation and/or ADHD module of structured diagnostic interview, completed by the study clinician.
Right handedness

Exclusion Criteria:

Any current psychiatric or medical condition determined to be clinically significant.
Current use of psychotropics or any medication with clinically significant CNS effects.
Mental retardation (IQ < 80).
Significant sensory deficits such as deafness or blindness.

Summary

Control

ADHD

All Events

Event Type Organ System Event Term Control ADHD

Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS)

An 18-item scale rating a subject's level of impairment from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) for each symptom of DSM-IV ADHD, with a maximum possible score of 54. The measure was collected at Baseline and 6 weeks, and a total score was calculated to gauge treatment response of ADHD subjects to open-label Concerta.

ADHD

6 weeks

15.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.4

Baseline

37.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 8.7

Controls

Percent Errors in Visual Go/NoGo Task

The Go/NoGo visual task was completed by subjects with ADHD as well as healthy controls. The Go/NoGo task is used to assess inhibitory control, and targets response inhibition, executive functions, and sustained attention. The 'Go' stimulus occupies 80% of the trials, and requires the subject to perform a motor response each time it appears on the screen. A rare 'No Go' stimulus (occupies 20% of all trials) requires the subject to refrain from responding. The percentage of errors were measured for each group.

ADHD and Visual NoGo Task

19.01
percentage of errors

Control Group and Visual NoGo Task

13.89
percentage of errors

ADHD and Visual Go Task

2.88
percentage of errors

Control Group and Visual Go Task

1.27
percentage of errors

Total

71
Participants

Age, Continuous

34.0
years (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.8

Age, Categorical

Region of Enrollment

Sex: Female, Male

Overall Study

Control

ADHD

Drop/Withdrawal Reasons

Control

ADHD