Title
Efficacy and Safety of Electrical Versus Pharmacological Cardioversion in Early Atrial Fibrillation
Efficacy and Safety of Electrical Versus Pharmacological Cardioversion in Early Atrial Fibrillation: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Phase
N/ALead Sponsor
Valduce HospitalStudy Type
InterventionalStatus
Completed No Results PostedIndication/Condition
Atrial FibrillationIntervention/Treatment
propafenone ...Study Participants
247The optimal strategy to restore sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) of less than 48 hours' duration is still controversial. The investigators performed a controlled single-center trial to compare electrical and pharmacological (propafenone) cardioversion to restore the sinus rhythm in selected patients with acute atrial fibrillation.
External cardioversion was performed in anteroposterior position (right sternal body at the third intercostal space-angle of the left scapula); patients were submitted to a biphasic wave-form sequential shock of 100-150-200 J, if necessary.
Propafenone (2 mg/kg bolus) was administered to obtain pharmacolgic sinus rhythm conversion.
Patients were sedated with propofol and external cardioversion was performed in anteroposterior position (right sternal body at the third intercostal space-angle of the left scapula). Patients were submitted to a biphasic wave-form sequential shock of 100-150-200 J, if necessary.
Propafenone (2 mg/kg bolus) was administered iv to obtain pharmacologic sinus rhythm conversion.
Inclusion Criteria: atrial fibrillation of less than 48 hours' duration. Exclusion Criteria: AF of more than 48 hours' hemodynamic instability acute onset atrial fibrillation due to acute coronary syndrome electrolyte disturbances sepsis fever hypothermia untreated hyperthyroidism use of antiarrhythmic drugs high embolic risk unclear duration of symptoms