Title
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Normal Sensation and Pain in Healthy Volunteers
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Normal Sensation and Pain in Healthy Volunteers (Carl Koller Grant) (The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Allodynia)
Phase
N/ALead Sponsor
University of Alabama, BirminghamStudy Type
InterventionalStatus
Completed Results PostedIndication/Condition
PainIntervention/Treatment
lidocaine ...Study Participants
22The purpose of this study is to study if lidocaine, given intravenously, reduces pain.
Clinicians use lidocaine intravenously in a fashion that suggests that it might have analgesic effects. Therefore, we test the hypothesis that lidocaine reduces pain intensity in response to experimental pain.
Lidocaine 2% (2mg/ml) was administered via a computer assisted infusion to achieve a target plasma concentration of 2 mcg/ml; infused within 20 minutes.
Lidocaine 2% (2mg/ml) was administered via a computer assisted infusion to achieve a target plasma concentration of 2 mcg/ml; infused within 20 minutes.
Inclusion Criteria: Healthy Adult Volunteers, age >19 years Exclusion Criteria: History of Substance Abuse Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): unstable Congestive Heart Failure (CHF): unstable Heart Arrhythmia: symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Lidocaine Allergy Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Rev IV): Axis I: Common Axis I disorders include depression, anxiety disorders,bipolar disorder, ADHD, and schizophrenia. Axis II: borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and mild mental retardation. Presence of Contraindications for MRI Presence of electronically, magnetically, and mechanically activated implants Electronically, magnetically, and mechanically activated implants Ferromagnetic or electronically operated active devices like automatic cardioverter defibrillators Cardiac pacemakers Metallic splinters in the eye Ferromagnetic haemostatic clips in the central nervous system (CNS) Claustrophobia Pregnancy
| Event Type | Organ System | Event Term |
|---|
The right arm was exsanguinated by elevating it above heart level for 30 seconds, after which the arm was occluded with a standard blood pressure cuff positioned proximal to the elbow inflated to twice the participant's mean arterial pressure. Participants then performed 20 handgrip exercises of 2-second duration at 4-second intervals at 50% of their maximum grip strength. Pain was rated on a scale from 0 - 10 with 0 being no pain to 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Peripheral nerve stimulation electrodes were attached to the base and the tip of the third digit and connected to a constant current stimulator (DS7A, Digitimer Ltd, Hertfordshire, England). Ascending electrical stimuli of 2000 mu duration, ranging from 0.5 to 35 mA (ampere) was administered one per second in 0.5 mA increments. Participants were instructed to indicate when they first felt the slightest sense of pain (electrical pain threshold, EPTh) and when they were unable to tolerate a further increase (electrical pain tolerance, EPTo). For each measure, the average of three trials was computed for use in subsequent analyses. Each of the three electrical pain stimuli were presented three times and balanced in order using a Graeco-Latin square design. The pain scale is between 0 and 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
The thermal procedure involved a baseline assessment of heat pain threshold and tolerance. Contact heat stimuli were delivered using a computer-controlled Medoc Thermal Sensory Analyzer (TSA-II; Ramat Yishai, Israel), which is a peltier elementbased stimulator. Temperature levels were monitored by a thermistor and returned to a preset baseline of 32°C by active cooling at a rate of 10°C/s. The 3 × 3 cm contact probe was applied to the right forearm. The pain scale is between 0 and 10 with 1 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
The participant's foot was immersed up to the ankle into a container filled with ice water of 3°C. Participants were instructed to maintain their foot in the container until the cold pain became intolerable (cold pain tolerance). The length of time was recorded in seconds. This procedure was repeated once with a gap of at least fifteen minutes in-between repeated tests. The range was 0 seconds to 120 seconds
Pin prick sensory thresholds (PPT) were obtained by touching the skin in-between the first and second metacarpal bone with a 23-gauge needles which moved freely out of a 10 mL plastic syringe barrel. The pin prick sensation was modified by adding small weights to the 23-gauge needles (from 0.2 to 5.2 mg). A syringe barrel of tuberculin (TB) needles that were cut to different lengths to add the desired weight to the 23-gauge needle. The PPT was determined using the weighted 23-gauge needle in ascending order, according to the method of limits. This assessment was to evaluate whether participants were able to feel the touch of the needle. The participant's arm was placed on a tray table. A linen sheet was suspended in-between two IV poles in such a fashion that the subject's view of his/her hand was blocked. Normal values are between 0.21mg and 5mg.
