Title

Dynamic Hyperinflation and Tiotropium
Simplified Detection of Dynamic Hyperinflation Using Metronome Paced Hyperventilation and the Effect of Tiotropium in Patients With COPD
  • Phase

    Phase 4
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Indication/Condition

    COPD
  • Study Participants

    30
We will detect dynamic hyperinflation (DH) in 40 COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) patients with moderately severe disease using metronome paced hyperventilation (MPH) with inspiratory capacity as the primary end point. Hypothesis: Is tiotropium capable of lung volume protecting inspiratory capacity from MPH induced DH vs placebo in a randomized crossover double blinded study.
Study completed with 29 patients studied. Data is being analyzed to evaluate trough and peak effect of 18 µg tiotropium vs placebo on FEV 1 (L)(forced expiratory capacity in one second), inspiratory capacity and functional residual volume. In addition, we will study the effect of 18 µg tiotropium vs placebo on metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation. We will also evaluate the effect of tiotropium induced increase in IC (inspiratory capacity) vs extent of emphysema as evaluated on high resolution thin section CT lung
Study Started
Oct 31
2006
Primary Completion
Feb 28
2009
Study Completion
Mar 31
2009
Results Posted
Oct 05
2012
Estimate
Last Update
Aug 20
2019

Drug Placebo

Procedure/Surgery - tiotropium 18ug capsule daily for 1 month vs placebo to study the effect of trough and peak effect on bronchodilation and effect of metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation

Tiotropium 18 µg capsule, bronchodilator Active Comparator

tiotropium 18 µg capsule for 1 month versus placebo. To study bronchodilation and effect following metronome paced hyperventilation and induced dynamic hyperinflation of active tiotropium versus placebo

2 Placebo Comparator

placebo 18ug tiotropium for 1 month

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Moderately severe COPD patients age 40-85 yr with post 180ug albuterol FEV 1 between 60 and 79% predicted and FEV 1/FVC < 70%.
Smoking history > 10 pack yr.
Clinically stable X 6 weeks.
No oxygen usage.

Exclusion Criteria:

History of asthma
Clinically unstable
Any other significant medical problem precluding full cooperation for study

Summary

Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg, Capsule,

Placebo

All Events

Event Type Organ System Event Term

Bronchodilator Response:Peak FEV1(L)(Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second)-

Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FEV1 (+2h) after 30 days of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients. FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in one second

Placebo

1.74
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.58

Tiotropium

1.82
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.59

Bronchodilator Response: Trough TLC (L) (Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo

Lung function studies Trough TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients

Placebo

5.99
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.18

Tiotropium

5.86
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.25

IC (Inspiratory Capacity L)and Metronome Paced Hyperventilation-induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo and Baseline

IC measurement before and after metronome paced hyperventilation-induced dynamic hyperinflation at baseline and in tiotropium and placebo groups. Measure ratio of functional residual capacity divided by total lung capacity at baseline and after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo

Before DH (Dynamic Hyperinflation)

Baseline IC (inspiratory capacity)

2.09
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.83

Placebo IC

2.17
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.82

Tiotropium IC

2.24
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.80

After DH (Dynamic Hyperinflation

Baseline IC (inspiratory capacity)

1.76
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.70

Placebo IC

1.8
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.70

Tiotropium IC

1.8
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.74

TLC (L) Before and After Metronome Paced Hyperventilation Induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo

Total lung capacity before and after metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation in tiotropium cohort versus placebo. Difference between TLC measured at one hour before intervention & 2 hrs. after after 30 days of treatment with either placebo or tiotropium

2h Post Placebo TLC(L)

After DH

5.84
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.13

Before DH (dynamic hyperinflation)

5.96
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.22

TLC (L) 2h Post Tiotropium

After DH

5.78
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.14

Before DH (dynamic hyperinflation)

5.84
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.35

Bronchodilator Response:Peak FRC (L) (Functional Residual Capacity)

Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FRC after 30 days (+2h) of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients.

Placebo

3.8
Liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.79

Tiotropium

3.72
Liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.84

Bronchodilator Response: Peak FVC (L) (Forced Vital Capacity)- Tiotropium and Placebo

Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) of peak forced vital capaciy (L) after 30 days (+2h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Forced vital capacity - liters

Placebo

3.17
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.13

Tiotropium 18 µg Capsule, Bronchodilator

3.27
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.16

Bronchodilator Response: Peak IC (L) - (Inspiratory Capacity) - Tiotropium Versus Placebo

Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) - Peak inspiratory capacity after 30 days (+2h)of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Inspiratory capacity- liters

Placebo

2.12
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.82

Tiotropium

2.24
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.80

Bronchodilator Response: Peak FRC/TLC Percentage (Functional Residual Capacity(L)/Total Lung Capacity(L) - Tiotropium or Placebo

Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) peak Peak FRC/TLC after 30 days (+2h)of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage

Placebo

0.65
percentage of FRC/TLC (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.10

Tiotropium

0.66
percentage of FRC/TLC (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.17

Bronchodilator Response: Peak TLC (L) (Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium or Placebo

Net change in lung function studies (mean +/- SE) from baseline to trough (-1h) and peak (+2h) after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Total lung capacity - liters

Placebo

5.91
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.22

Tiotropium

5.82
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.35

Bronchodilator Response: Trough FEV1 (L)- (Forced Expiratory Volume) Tiotropium Versus Placebo

Lung function studies Trough FEV1(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Forced expiratory volume in 1s (liters)

Placebo

1.68
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.54

Tiotropium

1.71
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.56

Bronchodilator Response: Trough FRC (L)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo

Lung function studies Trough FRC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity(liters)

Placebo

3.84
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.84

Tiotropium

3.66
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.88

Bronchodilator Response: Trough FVC (L)- (Forced Vital Capacity) Tiotropium Versus Placebo

Lung function studies Trough FVC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients

Placebo

3.12
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.10

Tiotropium

3.15
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.13

Bronchodilator Response: Trough IC (L) Inspiratory Capacity - Tiotropium Versus Placebo

Lung function studies (Trough IC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough inspiratory capacity- liters

Placebo

2.17
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.77

Tiotropium

2.11
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.83

Bronchodilator Response: Trough FRC/TLC (Functional Residual Capacity/Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo

Lung function studies Trough FRC/TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage

Placebo

0.64
percentage of FRC/TLC (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.09

Tiotropium

0.62
percentage of FRC/TLC (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.09

Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema and and Lung Function of FEV1(l) After Tiotropium

Correlation between improved lung function after tiotropium and extent of lung CT scored emphysema with respect to FEV 1; correlation of tiotropium induced bronchodilation and extent of lung ct scored emphysema; measures include increase in FEV1 from baseline to peak tiotropium

Lung CT Scored Emphysema and FEV1

13.68
percentage of lung tissue (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 18.84

IC (Inspiratory Capacity, L) Post Mph (Metronome Paced Hyperventilation) Induced dh (Dynamic Hyperinflation) After Tiotropium and Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema

Correlation between change in inspiratory capacity (L) post metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation and extent of lung ct scored emphysema

Lung CT Scored Emphysema and IC

13.68
percentage of lung tissue (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 18.84

Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema and and Lung Function of FRC/TLC (Functional Residual Capacity(L)/Total Lung Capacity (L) After Tiotropium

Correlation between improved lung function after tiotropium and extent of lung CT scored emphysema with respect to ratio functional residual capacity divided by total lung capacity. Specifically, correlation of tiotropium induced bronchodilation and extent of lung ct scored emphysema

Lung CT Scored Emphysema and FRC/TLC

13.68
percentage of lung tissue (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 18.84

Average participant age +/- SD

70
years (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9

D(L)CO(SB) - ml/min/mmHg observed (Single-breath diffusing capacity )

14
ml/min/mmHg (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5

D(L)CO(SB) - ml/min/mmHg % predicted

69
ml/min/mmHg (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 23

FEV1/FVC percentage

56
percentage of liters expected (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 8

FRC (L) (functional residual capacity) observed

3.9
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.8

FRC percent of liters predicted

138
percentage of liters predicted (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 29

RV (L) - % predicted

131
percentage (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 37

RV (L) (residual volume) observed

2.9
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.1

SGaw (Lps/cmH2O/L) (specific airway conductance)

0.10
Lps/cmH2O/L (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.08

TLC (L) (total lung capacity) observed

5.9
liters (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.3

TLC Percent of liters predicted

109
percentage of liters predicted (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 16

Age, Categorical

FEV1(L) (forces expiratory volume) observed

FEV1 (L) percent predicted

FEV1 (L) percent predicted

FVC

FVC

FVC (forced vital capacity)

Region of Enrollment

Sex: Female, Male

Period: First Intervention

Tiotropium 18 µg Capsule First, Then Placebo

Placebo First, Then Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg

Period: Second Intervention

Tiotropium 18 µg Capsule First, Then Placebo

Placebo First, Then Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg

Drop/Withdrawal Reasons

Placebo First, Then Tiotropium Bromide 18 µg