Title

Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography
GEHC Has Decided Not to Provide This Detail But Will Rely on the Brief Title.
  • Phase

    Phase 4
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Study Participants

    656
It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
GEHC has decided not to provide this detail
Study Started
Jun 30
2005
Primary Completion
May 31
2011
Study Completion
Jul 31
2011
Results Posted
Oct 10
2014
Estimate
Last Update
Oct 17
2014
Estimate

Drug Iodixanol 320-Arm 1

  • Other names: Visipaque

Drug Iopamidol 300-Arm 2

  • Other names: Isovue

Iodixanol 320-Arm 1 Active Comparator

Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL

Iopamidol 300-Arm 2 Active Comparator

Iopamidol 300 mg I/mL

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with a combination of diabetes mellitus (type I or II) and renal impairment who are referred for a contrast-enhanced CT examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

Concurrent administration of potentially nephroprotective or nephrotoxic drugs is not permitted.
Patients undergoing dialysis or kidney transplantation will not be included.

Summary

Iodixanol 320-Arm 1

Iopamidol 300-Arm 2

All Events

Event Type Organ System Event Term Iodixanol 320-Arm 1 Iopamidol 300-Arm 2

Assessment of the Incidence Rate of Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients With Impaired Renal Function.

The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of CIN, defined as an intra-individual increase in serum creatinine (SCr) of greater than or equal to 44.2 µmol/L (greater than or equal to 0.5 mg/dL). Subjects with a pre-contrast (baseline) serum creatinine value greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL for males and greater than or equal to 1.3 mg/dL for females or eGFR of less than or equal to 50 mL/min/1.73m squared, and a post-contrast serum creatinine value available on days 2 or 3, administered greater than or equal to100 mL or greater than or equal to 1.5 mL/kg bodyweight IMP, without presence of any major protocol violations, and without evidence of other causes inducing acute renal dysfunction.

Iodixanol 320-Arm 1

9.9
percentage of subjects
95% Confidence Interval: 5.67 to 14.12

Iopamidol 300-Arm 2

10.63
percentage of subjects
95% Confidence Interval: 6.43 to 14.83

Assessment of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-enhanced Multi-detector-row Helical Computed Tomography (MDCT) Examination.

Overall Image Quality rated as "Excellent, Good, Sufficient or Insufficient Poor" by radiologists blinded to the contrast administration.

Iodixanol 320-Arm 1

Image Quality-Excellent

220.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Good

81.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Insufficient

7.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Sufficient

13.0
Number of images

Iodixanol 320-Arm 1

Image Quality-Excellent

220.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Good

81.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Insufficient

7.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Sufficient

13.0
Number of images

Iopamidol 300-Arm 2

Image Quality-Excellent

207.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Good

103.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Insufficient

8.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Sufficient

9.0
Number of images

Iopamidol 300-Arm 2

Image Quality-Excellent

207.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Good

103.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Insufficient

8.0
Number of images

Image Quality-Sufficient

9.0
Number of images

Total

648
Participants

Age, Continuous

66.4
years (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.01

Age, Categorical

Region of Enrollment

Sex: Female, Male

Overall Study

Iodixanol 320-Arm 1

Iopamidol 300-Arm 2