Title

Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab and Methotrexate (MTX) Versus MTX Monotherapy in Subjects With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Prospective Multi-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled, Parallel-Groups Study Comparing the Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-TNFα Antibody Adalimumab Given Every Second Week With Methotrexate Given Weekly and the Combination of Adalimumab and Methotrexate Administered Over 2 Years in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (PREMIER).
  • Phase

    Phase 3
  • Study Type

    Interventional
  • Intervention/Treatment

    naltrexone adalimumab ...
  • Study Participants

    799
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess the long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy after treatment with adalimumab for up to 10 years.
This study had an initial 2-year double-blind treatment period followed by an 8-year open-label extension period, for a total of up to 10 years study duration. The study was designed to assess the potential of adalimumab + methotrexate to improve signs and symptoms of disease and to inhibit radiographic progression in patients with recent onset (disease duration less than 3 years) rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with methotrexate. Adalimumab is a human anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody.
Study Started
Dec 31
2000
Primary Completion
Apr 30
2004
Study Completion
Apr 30
2012
Results Posted
Feb 25
2010
Estimate
Last Update
Jul 12
2013
Estimate

Biological Adalimumab

  • Other names: ABT-D2E7, Humira

Drug Methotrexate

Biological Adalimumab placebo

Drug Methotrexate placebo

Adalimumab Experimental

Participants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and placebo to methotrexate orally once a week during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase and then adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension.

Adalimumab + methotrexate Experimental

Participants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase.

Methotrexate Experimental

Participants received placebo to adalimumab subcutaneous injection once every other week and methotrexate orally once a week at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/week (could be escalated up to 20 mg/week) during the 2-year double-blind treatment phase. Participants received adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 8 years in the open-label extension phase.

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Subject was age 18 or older and in good health (Investigator discretion) with a recent stable medical history.
Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, with a disease duration less than 3 years, at least 8 swollen joints out of the 66 joints assessed, at least 10 tender joints out of the 68 joints assessed, at least 1 joint erosion or rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >= 28 mm/1h or C-reactive protein (CRP) >= 1.5 mg/dl

Exclusion Criteria:

Chronic arthritis diagnosed before the age of 16
Preceding treatment with MTX, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, azathioprine or more than 2 other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
Subject previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy
Permanently wheelchair-bound or bedridden patients
Subject considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study
Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant

Summary

Methotrexate

Adalimumab

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Any Adalimumab

All Events

Event Type Organ System Event Term Methotrexate Adalimumab Adalimumab + Methotrexate Any Adalimumab

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52

The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 52 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

Methotrexate

5.7
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.7

Adalimumab

3.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.2

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

1.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.5

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 52

American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants who withdrew early were considered non-responders.

Methotrexate

118.0
participants

Adalimumab

113.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

165.0
participants

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 104

The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and Week 104 were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

Methotrexate

10.4
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 21.7

Adalimumab

5.5
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.8

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

1.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 8.3

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission, Defined as a Disease Activity 28 (DAS28) Score < 2.6 at Week 52

The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C reactive protein, and general health were included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score >5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score <3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score <2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Methotrexate

53.0
participants

Adalimumab

64.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

115.0
participants

Change From Baseline in the Physical Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52

The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.

Methotrexate

12.5
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.6

Adalimumab

12.6
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.0

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

16.7
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.2

Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response After 104 Weeks of Treatment

Major clinical response was defined as an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response for any six continuous months, over 104 weeks of treatment. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were non-responders.

Methotrexate Weekly

70.0
participants

Adalimumab

67.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

130.0
participants

Change From Baseline in the Mental Component of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) at Week 52

The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.

Methotrexate

6.5
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.0

Adalimumab

7.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.3

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

7.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 13.1

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Weeks 26 and 76

American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

Methotrexate

Week 26

104.0
participants

Week 76

114.0
participants

Adalimumab

Week 26

96.0
participants

Week 76

114.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 26

157.0
participants

Week 76

161.0
participants

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase

American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

Methotrexate

Week 104

144.0
participants

Week 26

158.0
participants

Week 52

161.0
participants

Week 76

154.0
participants

Adalimumab

Week 104

135.0
participants

Week 26

146.0
participants

Week 52

149.0
participants

Week 76

137.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104

186.0
participants

Week 26

184.0
participants

Week 52

195.0
participants

Week 76

185.0
participants

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria During the Double-blind Phase

American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104

125.0
participants

Week 26

114.0
participants

Week 52

122.0
participants

Week 76

127.0
participants

Methotrexate

Week 104

73.0
participants

Week 26

57.0
participants

Week 52

70.0
participants

Week 76

75.0
participants

Adalimumab

Week 104

77.0
participants

Week 26

54.0
participants

Week 52

71.0
participants

Week 76

79.0
participants

Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.

Methotrexate

Week 104 [166, 162, 201]

-0.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Week 12 [N=236, 246, 252]

-0.6
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Week 26 [N=217, 222, 240]

-0.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Week 76 [N= 176, 175, 207]

-0.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Adalimumab

Week 104 [166, 162, 201]

-0.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Week 12 [N=236, 246, 252]

-0.6
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Week 26 [N=217, 222, 240]

-0.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.7

Week 76 [N= 176, 175, 207]

-0.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.7

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104 [166, 162, 201]

-1.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.7

Week 12 [N=236, 246, 252]

-0.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Week 26 [N=217, 222, 240]

-0.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Week 76 [N= 176, 175, 207]

-1.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.7

Number of Participants With Improvement in the HAQ-DI Score ≥ 0.3 During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability.

Methotrexate

Week 104

137.0
participants

Week 26

172.0
participants

Week 52

158.0
participants

Week 76

144.0
participants

Adalimumab

Week 104

132.0
participants

Week 26

169.0
participants

Week 52

151.0
participants

Week 76

145.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104

171.0
participants

Week 26

200.0
participants

Week 52

186.0
participants

Week 76

173.0
participants

Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI 2/3) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The HUI 2/3 is an assessment of various aspects of participants' health and ability to perform various tasks on a day-to-day basis, including reading, seeing, hearing, speaking, general outlook on life, pain/discomfort, ability to walk, use of hands, memory, ability to think/solve, and ability to perform basic activities such as eating, bathing, and dressing. The HUI 2/3 is a combined 15-item questionnaire based on a recall period of the previous 4 weeks. HUI-2 and HUI-3 scores are calculated independently. The HUI-2 score includes 6 attributes: Sensation, Mobility, Emotion, Cognition, Self-Care, and Pain. The HUI-3 score is comprised of 8 attributes: Vision, Hearing, Speech, Ambulation, Dexterity, Emotion, Cognition, and Pain. The range of each score is from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). An increase from Baseline indicates improvement.

Methotrexate

HUI-2: Week 104 [N=152, 136, 174]

0.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-2: Week 26 [N=192, 187, 205]

0.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-2: Week 52 [N=179, 162, 189]

0.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-3: Week 104 [N=154, 138, 177]

0.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-3: Week 26 [N=192, 189, 205]

0.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.3

HUI-3: Week 52 [N=177, 164, 190]

0.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.3

Adalimumab

HUI-2: Week 104 [N=152, 136, 174]

0.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-2: Week 26 [N=192, 187, 205]

0.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-2: Week 52 [N=179, 162, 189]

0.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-3: Week 104 [N=154, 138, 177]

0.4
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.3

HUI-3: Week 26 [N=192, 189, 205]

0.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.3

HUI-3: Week 52 [N=177, 164, 190]

0.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.3

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

HUI-2: Week 104 [N=152, 136, 174]

0.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-2: Week 26 [N=192, 187, 205]

0.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-2: Week 52 [N=179, 162, 189]

0.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.2

HUI-3: Week 104 [N=154, 138, 177]

0.4
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.3

HUI-3: Week 26 [N=192, 189, 205]

0.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.3

HUI-3: Week 52 [N=177, 164, 190]

0.4
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.3

Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component and items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); increases from Baseline indicate improvement.

Methotrexate

Mental Component: Week 104 [N=160, 157, 189]

8.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.9

Mental Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]

7.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.6

Physical Component: Week 104 [160, 157, 189]

12.4
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.3

Physical Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]

11.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.0

Adalimumab

Mental Component: Week 104 [N=160, 157, 189]

6.6
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 13.5

Mental Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]

5.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 13.5

Physical Component: Week 104 [160, 157, 189]

13.4
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.7

Physical Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]

10.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.2

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Mental Component: Week 104 [N=160, 157, 189]

6.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.0

Mental Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]

6.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.1

Physical Component: Week 104 [160, 157, 189]

16.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 11.2

Physical Component: Week 26 [N=199, 204, 221]

14.7
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.2

Numeric American College of Rheumatology (ACR-N) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

ACR-N is a composite, continuous variable which measures the percentage of improvement from Baseline in individual participants based on the 7 core set variables of the ACR. ACR-N is defined as the smallest percent change from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC), and the median percent improvement in the 5 remaining measures (Patient's Assessment of Pain, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI], and C-Reactive Protein). A positive ACR-N value indicates improvement; a negative ACR-N value indicates worsening; ACR-N of 0 indicates no change.

Methotrexate

Week 104 [N=168, 167, 203]

57.3
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 37.1

Week 26 [N=218, 224, 244]

44.7
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 42.2

Week 52 [N=194, 193, 220]

50.2
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 48.2

Week 76 [N=181, 179, 211]

56.1
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 38.1

Adalimumab

Week 104 [N=168, 167, 203]

54.0
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 42.7

Week 26 [N=218, 224, 244]

39.1
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 43.3

Week 52 [N=194, 193, 220]

44.4
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 52.2

Week 76 [N=181, 179, 211]

51.5
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 56.8

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104 [N=168, 167, 203]

71.4
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 31.0

Week 26 [N=218, 224, 244]

57.0
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 42.2

Week 52 [N=194, 193, 220]

66.3
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 34.8

Week 76 [N=181, 179, 211]

68.8
percent change (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 31.3

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: 28 tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein, and Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Methotrexate

Week 104 [N=161, 158, 191]

-3.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.4

Week 26 [N=209, 218, 229]

-2.6
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.3

Week 52 [N=184, 185, 206]

-2.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.4

Week 76 [N=173, 173, 197]

-3.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.2

Adalimumab

Week 104 [N=161, 158, 191]

-3.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.4

Week 26 [N=209, 218, 229]

-2.4
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.4

Week 52 [N=184, 185, 206]

-2.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.5

Week 76 [N=173, 173, 197]

-3.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.5

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104 [N=161, 158, 191]

-3.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.3

Week 26 [N=209, 218, 229]

-3.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.3

Week 52 [N=184, 185, 206]

-3.6
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.3

Week 76 [N=173, 173, 197]

-3.7
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.3

Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period

Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with >80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion)to 230 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion.

Methotrexate

Week 104

6.4
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 14.3

Week 52

3.7
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 8.4

Adalimumab

Week 104

3.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 8.3

Week 52

1.7
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.7

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104

1.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 4.7

Week 52

0.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 3.3

Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score During the Double-blind Treatment Period

Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (16 joints) and each forefoot (5 joints) on a 5-point scale (0 = no narrowing; 1 = up to 25% narrowing; 2 = 26-65% narrowing; 3 = 66-99% narrowing; and 4 = complete narrowing). Scores were summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (maximum narrowing). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN.

Methotrexate

Week 104

4.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 10.9

Week 52

2.0
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.3

Adalimumab

Week 104

2.6
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.5

Week 52

1.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 6.6

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104

0.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 5.1

Week 52

0.5
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 4.2

Number of Participants With No Worsening in Modified Total Sharp Score or Components During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The number of participants with no worsening in the modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and in erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores, where no worsening is defined as a change from Baseline of ≤ 0 in mTSS, erosion score and JSN score, at Weeks 52 and 104. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

Adalimumab

Erosion Scoe: Week 52

133.0
participants

Erosion Score: Week 104

121.0
participants

Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 104

147.0
participants

Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 52

159.0
participants

Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 104

105.0
participants

Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 52

112.0
participants

Methotrexate

Erosion Scoe: Week 52

91.0
participants

Erosion Score: Week 104

81.0
participants

Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 104

112.0
participants

Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 52

127.0
participants

Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 104

70.0
participants

Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 52

78.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Erosion Scoe: Week 52

158.0
participants

Erosion Score: Week 104

148.0
participants

Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 104

175.0
participants

Joint Space Narrowing Score: Week 52

190.0
participants

Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 104

136.0
participants

Modified Total Sharp Score: Week 52

141.0
participants

Number of Participants With No Erosions at Baseline and No New Erosions at Weeks 52 and 104

The number of participants with no erosions at Baseline and no erosions at Weeks 52 and 104, where no erosions and no new erosions are defined as an erosion score = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints on each hand/wrist (17 joints) and each forefoot (6 joints) were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 = no erosions; 1 = 1 discrete erosion or ≤20% joint involvement; 2 = 2 separate quadrants with erosion or 21-40% joint involvement; 3 = 3 separate quadrants with erosion or 41-60% joint involvement; 4 = all 4 quadrants with erosion or 61-80% joint involvement; and 5 = extensive destruction with >80% joint involvement. Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 230 (worst).

Methotrexate

Week 104

7.0
participants

Week 52

8.0
participants

Adalimumab

Week 104

8.0
participants

Week 52

10.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104

11.0
participants

Week 52

13.0
participants

Number of Participants With Non-Involved Joints at Baseline and No Newly Involved Joints at Weeks 52 and 104

Number of participants with non-involved joints at Baseline and no newly involved joints at Weeks 52 and 104, where involved joints or no newly involved joints are defined as modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) = 0. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]).

Methotrexate

Week 104

3.0
participants

Week 52

4.0
participants

Adalimumab

Week 104

7.0
participants

Week 52

9.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Week 104

9.0
participants

Week 52

12.0
participants

Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For participants randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.

Any Adalimumab

Year 10 [N=170]

154.0
participants

Year 1 [N=410]

340.0
participants

Year 2 [N=385]

332.0
participants

Year 5 [N=325]

231.0
participants

Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.

Any Adalimumab

Year 10 [N=170]

127.0
participants

Year 1 [N=410]

269.0
participants

Year 2 [N=385]

266.0
participants

Year 5 [N=325]

194.0
participants

Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Baseline is the last value prior to the first dose of adalimumab. For patients randomized to the methotrexate (MTX) arm in the double-blind (DB) phase, Baseline was the last visit prior to the first adalimumab dose at Week 106 of the open-label (OL) phase.

Any Adalimumab

Year 10 [N=170]

102.0
participants

Year 1 [N=410]

186.0
participants

Year 2 [N=385]

207.0
participants

Year 5 [N=325]

153.0
participants

Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.

Any Adalimumab

Year 10 [N=170]

-0.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.73

Year 1 [N=407]

-0.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.68

Year 2 [N=390]

-0.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.70

Year 5 [N=344]

-0.7
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.73

Change From Baseline in DAS28 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: 28 tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein, and Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Any Adalimumab

Year 10 [N=158]

-3.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.29

Year 1 [N=403]

-3.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.49

Year 2 [N=386]

-3.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.61

Year 5 [N=330]

-2.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 1.93

Number of Participants With DAS28 < 2.6 and < 3.2 Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

The DAS28 is a composite score of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity derived from the following variables: 28 tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein, and Patient's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Adalimumab: DAS28 < 2.6

Year 10 [N=159]

109.0
participants

Year 1 [N=405]

173.0
participants

Year 2 [N=389]

215.0
participants

Year 5 [N=333]

190.0
participants

Adalimumab: DAS28 < 3.2

Year 10 [N=159]

135.0
participants

Year 1 [N=405]

244.0
participants

Year 2 [N=389]

271.0
participants

Year 5 [N=333]

244.0
participants

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) Over 10 Years

The modified TSS (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.

Methotrexate

Year 10 [N= 83, 93, 90]

10.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 20.01

Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]

6.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 12.44

Adalimumab

Year 10 [N= 83, 93, 90]

9.2
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 15.21

Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]

5.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.63

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Year 10 [N= 83, 93, 90]

3.9
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 9.64

Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]

0.3
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 3.00

Number of Participants With No Radiographic Progression Over 10 Years

The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. Digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet obtained at screening and during the study were scored in a blinded manner. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. The number of participants with change from Baseline ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 0 is reported as a measure of no disease progression.

Methotrexate

Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]

26.0
participants

Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]

36.0
participants

Change ≤ 0 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]

19.0
participants

Change ≤ 0 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]

22.0
participants

Adalimumab

Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]

22.0
participants

Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]

40.0
participants

Change ≤ 0 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]

16.0
participants

Change ≤ 0 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]

30.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]

33.0
participants

Change ≤ 0.5 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]

65.0
participants

Change ≤ 0 at Year 10 [N=83, 93, 90]

29.0
participants

Change ≤ 0 at Year 2 [N=83, 92, 89]

51.0
participants

Composite Score of ACR50 Plus No Change in Modified Total Sharp Score

Methotrexate

Adalimumab

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

A major clinical response was defined as maintenance of an ACR70 response for at least a 6-month continuous period at any time during the study following the first dose of adalimumab. A participant was a responder if the following criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein).

Any Adalimumab

273.0
participants

Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 104

American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); Acute phase reactant value (C-Reactive Protein). Participants withdrawing early were considered non-responders.

Methotrexate

110.0
participants

Adalimumab

101.0
participants

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

158.0
participants

Number of Participants With Improvement in HAQ-DI by 0.22 and 0.5 Units Over 10 Years by Adalimumab Exposure

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A decrease in the HAQ-DI score represents an improvement in physical function; a clinically significant improvement is defined as a decrease of least 0.22 from Baseline in the HAQ-DI score. The number of participants with improvement in HAQ-DI of at least 0.22 and 0.5 units from Baseline is reported.

Adalimumab: HAQ Decrease ≥ 0.22

Year 10 [N=170]

140.0
participants

Year 1 [N=407]

353.0
participants

Year 2 [N=390]

324.0
participants

Year 5 [N=344]

239.0
participants

Adalimumab: HAQ Decrease ≥ 0.5

Year 10 [N=170]

112.0
participants

Year 1 [N=407]

285.0
participants

Year 2 [N=390]

265.0
participants

Year 5 [N=344]

188.0
participants

Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement.

Adalimumab

-0.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.7

Methotrexate

-0.8
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

-1.1
units on a scale (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 0.6

Total

799
Participants

Age Continuous

52.0
years (Mean)
Standard Deviation: 13.5

Sex: Female, Male

2-year Double-blind Treatment Period

Methotrexate

Adalimumab

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Open-Label Extension Period

Methotrexate

Adalimumab

Adalimumab + Methotrexate

Drop/Withdrawal Reasons

Methotrexate

Adalimumab

Adalimumab + Methotrexate